The national anthem we sing nowadays was originally the anthem of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Because many people can't identify with this song, for years now many groups have called for a new national anthem. Recently, the Taiwan Peace Foundation (台灣和平基金會) announced a competition inviting people to compose lyrics and music for a new national song. As the cash prize is quite generous, a lot of people are participating, and the competition has drawn a lot of attention.
The national anthem represents the country. Within the country, it can bring the hearts of the people together and unite them. To the outside, it represents the country, its history and special characteristics. Everyone therefore has high expectations of the words and music of a national anthem. A look at the history of the anthems of other countries might provide some ideas.
The German anthem has had a complicated history. It started out as a song written by the Austrian composer Franz Josef Haydn in 1797 in praise of Emperor Franz the Second of Austria. This ode to the emperor became the anthem of the Austria-Hungarian empire until its collapse in 1918. In 1841, professor August Heinrich Hoffmann von Fallersleben wrote a poem titled Das Lied der Deutschen. The poem was published to the melody of Haydn's eulogy of the Emperor. In the Weimar Republic, this Lied was chosen to be the German national anthem.
When the Nazis took over, they retained the song, but only sang the first of its three verses and played Das Horst-Wessel-Lied after that. After World War II, to avoid controversy, it was decided that only the third verse be sung as the national anthem, which went: "Unity and rights and freedom, for the German fatherland." Germany has been an empire and a republic, ruled by the Nazis and divided into East and West Germany and reunited in 1990. Through all this time, although the words of the anthem changed, the melody remained the same, because of Haydn's deeply touching music and the Germans' identification with the song. This history shows that the lyrics of an anthem can be changed according to whoever rules the country.
The British national anthem is even more interesting. Great Britain's God Save the King/Queen is a very old song known by many around the world. It is not only the national anthem of Great Britain, but has also been the anthem of other Commonwealth countries, and its melody has at times also been used for the anthems of other countries, including Norway, Germany from 1871 to 1922, Russia until 1833, Sweden, and Switzerland. It is still used by Liechtenstein. Even the patriotic American song My Country, 'Tis of Thee uses the same melody, as does a song of an independence movement in French New Caledonia. This shows that the melody of a national anthem does not have to be unique.
The lyrics of the South Korean anthem were written at the end of the 19th century, but the words were set to a Scottish folk song, until composer Ahn Eak-tae composed a melody for the song. This is a case in which the lyrics stayed the same while the melody changed.
Some national anthems are laid down in law, some naturally became a song that all the people could identify with.
Can a national anthem be changed? Of course it can. How can it be changed? All the people can participate. I invite everybody to compose lyrics and show their love and hope for our homeland Taiwan.
Yan Lu-fen is a professor in the Department of Music at the Taipei National University of the Arts.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS