On April 25, the WHO Secretariat rejected a letter sent by President Chen Shui-bian (
On Monday, the UN Office of Legal Affairs turned down an application submitted by Chen to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon for membership in the international organization under the same name.
In both cases, these international organizations ignored their guiding principles and yielded to China's pressure.
And both times, the pan-blue camp, instead of being upset by this unreasonable treatment, slammed the Chen administration for humiliating the nation.
Following this logic, it is best for Taiwan to simply remain silent on matters of international recognition so that it will not suffer the humiliation of rejection.
It's a pathetic mindset well demonstrated by remarks made by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
A short sound bite like this might make Ma look like a gentleman, a politician advocating peace. The truth is quite the opposite.
Choosing not to "clash" with China does not mean China will leave Taiwan alone or stop obstructing it in international matters.
Moreover, not provoking China is not tantamount to Taiwan remaining silent and giving up the fight for its dignity.
The pan-blue camp branded the DPP administration's move to join the UN and the WHO under the name "Taiwan" as inviting humiliation.
But isn't it absurd that Taiwan -- despite being noted around the world for its economic development and democratic achievements -- is not recognized as a legitimate member of the international community?
Isn't it foolish that Taiwan can't enjoy what other other countries with populations of 20,000 or 80,000 enjoy -- to be recognized with dignity?
DPP presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (
How true. And the same can apply to many other countries.
Citizens of Japan, Thailand, Germany and other countries can easily say what country they are from. Ask someone from this country the same question, and answers include "Taiwan," "the Republic of China," "Chinese Taipei" and "Taipei, China."
While it may be too much of a cliche to call Taiwan an international orphan, it remains true that Taiwan is in a sad position, being denied international recognition and legitimacy.
Silence is not golden when it comes to Taiwan's plight. If Taiwan does not keep standing and fighting, it will just be a matter of time before it falls victim to China 's saber-rattling and disappears from the map of nations.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS