The recent Betel Nut Culture Exposition and Forum at the Kaohsiung Business Exhibition Center was greeted with great fanfare. It seemed Taiwan wanted to convince the international media that chewing betel nut was part of Taiwanese culture. I find this deeply disturbing.
Research has shown that those who habitually chew betel nut, smoke cigarettes and drink alcohol are compounding their risk of developing cancer.
In the last 25 years, cancer has been the leading cause of death in Taiwan, with oral cancer the fourth-deadliest form. Nine out of 10 people who suffer from oral cancer are betel nut chewers. The oral cancer rate is increasing at an annual rate of 20 percent.
In 2003, the International Agency for Research on Cancer confirmed that the betel nut, without any supplements, is a carcinogen. The National Health Research Institute has said that within five years, Taiwan will lead the world in male oral cancer. Those little green betel nuts are a major public health menace.
My parents were both long-time betel nut chewers. They died from esophageal cancer and oral cancer. Toward the end, they were unable even to drink water, suffered from insomnia and lived with constant hunger pains. Seeing their suffering made a deep impression on me. I have been involved in medical service for nearly 60 years and know the impact of betel nut on public health. I only hope that more people can avoid the fearful and terrible pain of cancer.
Is betel nut culture really something that Taiwan should be proud of and flaunt? Ten years ago, the government started to require helmets for those riding mopeds, a measure that halved the number of fatal accidents and saves 3,000 lives annually. Most people were able to look beyond the inconvenience of strapping on the helmet to support behind the policy.
The Bureau of Health Promotion began to push for betel nut prevention this year, but this job requires a coordinated effort from all parts of the government, not just one bureau.
For example, the Ministry of Education could lend a hand with mass education and the Ministry of Finance could study the viability of doubling the tax on betel nuts. The Government Information Office could spread the word about the risks of chewing betel nut, while the Ministry of the Interior and the National Police Agency could work to ban illegal betel nut stands or betel nut beauties displays.
The Council of Agriculture and the Ministry of Economic Affairs should ban the importation of foreign betel nut while assisting betel nut farmers to switch careers.
The government should try to establish a culture where people refuse to chew betel nut. This plan would be like a helmet, one that could protect people against oral cancer. Taiwan should then be able to proudly tell the world about its declining cancer rate and have its people no longer live in fear of oral cancer.
Chang Chin-wen is honorary chairman of the Taiwan Hospital Association.
Translated by Jason Cox
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The
RSS