Since naming former premier Vincent Siew (
Ma has stated that he wants to make the economy the main issue of the presidential election -- the obvious rationale for choosing technocrat Siew -- and has declared the independence versus unification debate that has dominated Taiwanese politics over the last few years a "fake" issue.
So far, so good. Ma has pulled out all the stops to ensure the spotlight remains firmly on economic affairs, with his campaign activities frequently releasing plans for Taiwan's economy combined with speeches at various economic bodies and forums.
Ma is making an early effort to frame the debate and take the lead in deciding which issues will be discussed in the build-up to next March's election.
By doing so, he is also trying to divert attention from his biggest weakness -- his stance on Taiwan's status -- because Ma is fully aware that his view that Taiwan is part of China, in his case the Republic of China, is a potential election-losing issue.
Ma knows that his and the KMT's stated preference for eventual unification puts them at odds with a growing number of Taiwanese who do not identify with China and the majority who prefer to maintain the "status quo."
But while the vast number of Taiwanese are content with this -- for now -- practical way of dealing with the cross-strait conundrum, it is quite obvious that China is not at all content.
Beijing would not be continuing its relentless acquisition of advanced weaponry, quite clearly aimed at one day forcing Taiwan to acquiesce to its demands, if it was happy with waiting another few decades as Ma has suggested doing.
In fact one could argue that the independence-unification issue is the only thing on China's mind. It holds the importance of the "return of Taiwan" above all else.
The threat two years ago by a Chinese major general to strike US cities with nuclear weapons in the event of any US intervention in a cross-strait conflict and the 1,000 missiles Beijing has pointing at Taiwan shows how seriously many in China take this issue.
Therefore, it is going to be extremely difficult for Ma to avoid talking about it at some point.
The independence-unification issue is, unfortunately for Ma, not something that can be swept under the carpet so easily and he is being naive if he thinks he can keep the focus off it during the nine-month campaign.
Because like it or not, China is the biggest threat to Taiwan's future, and whether the subject is health, education, agriculture, tourism, diplomacy, participation in the international community, defense or the economy, the shadow of China and the difficulties of cross-strait policy connected to these issues looms menacingly in the background.
None of these subjects can be properly discussed without considering Taiwan's relations with China and therefore the sovereignty issue is bound to crop up sooner or later. This is the major flaw in Ma's strategy.
It will take an intense effort on behalf of the Ma camp and no small amount of political skill for him to avoid the sovereignty issue.
But then he has shown in the past how, if given the chance, he can manipulate the media to keep the focus off awkward situations and embarrassing problems.
He enjoyed reasonable success in this regard on the day he was indicted by simultaneously announcing his presidential bid.
But whatever transpires during the election build-up, Ma still has a very good chance of winning next year, partly because of his personal popularity and partly because of the changeovers that periodically occur in every two-party democracy.
But in order to stay the course and not jeopardize his victory chances, Ma must avoid getting cornered on the independence-unification issue, keeping his personal belief and that of his party locked far away from public scrutiny.
This will be a big ask, but he has given himself a head start by beginning the race early and on his own terms. Democratic Progressive Party candidate Frank Hsieh (
But in his haste to take the initiative Ma must be careful not to reveal too much of his hand too early, as doing so will provide a wily campaigner like Hsieh with the ammunition to fully expose any shortcomings in Ma's agenda and shoot down his presidential dream.
Richard Hazeldine is a writer based in Taipei.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS