Since naming former premier Vincent Siew (
Ma has stated that he wants to make the economy the main issue of the presidential election -- the obvious rationale for choosing technocrat Siew -- and has declared the independence versus unification debate that has dominated Taiwanese politics over the last few years a "fake" issue.
So far, so good. Ma has pulled out all the stops to ensure the spotlight remains firmly on economic affairs, with his campaign activities frequently releasing plans for Taiwan's economy combined with speeches at various economic bodies and forums.
Ma is making an early effort to frame the debate and take the lead in deciding which issues will be discussed in the build-up to next March's election.
By doing so, he is also trying to divert attention from his biggest weakness -- his stance on Taiwan's status -- because Ma is fully aware that his view that Taiwan is part of China, in his case the Republic of China, is a potential election-losing issue.
Ma knows that his and the KMT's stated preference for eventual unification puts them at odds with a growing number of Taiwanese who do not identify with China and the majority who prefer to maintain the "status quo."
But while the vast number of Taiwanese are content with this -- for now -- practical way of dealing with the cross-strait conundrum, it is quite obvious that China is not at all content.
Beijing would not be continuing its relentless acquisition of advanced weaponry, quite clearly aimed at one day forcing Taiwan to acquiesce to its demands, if it was happy with waiting another few decades as Ma has suggested doing.
In fact one could argue that the independence-unification issue is the only thing on China's mind. It holds the importance of the "return of Taiwan" above all else.
The threat two years ago by a Chinese major general to strike US cities with nuclear weapons in the event of any US intervention in a cross-strait conflict and the 1,000 missiles Beijing has pointing at Taiwan shows how seriously many in China take this issue.
Therefore, it is going to be extremely difficult for Ma to avoid talking about it at some point.
The independence-unification issue is, unfortunately for Ma, not something that can be swept under the carpet so easily and he is being naive if he thinks he can keep the focus off it during the nine-month campaign.
Because like it or not, China is the biggest threat to Taiwan's future, and whether the subject is health, education, agriculture, tourism, diplomacy, participation in the international community, defense or the economy, the shadow of China and the difficulties of cross-strait policy connected to these issues looms menacingly in the background.
None of these subjects can be properly discussed without considering Taiwan's relations with China and therefore the sovereignty issue is bound to crop up sooner or later. This is the major flaw in Ma's strategy.
It will take an intense effort on behalf of the Ma camp and no small amount of political skill for him to avoid the sovereignty issue.
But then he has shown in the past how, if given the chance, he can manipulate the media to keep the focus off awkward situations and embarrassing problems.
He enjoyed reasonable success in this regard on the day he was indicted by simultaneously announcing his presidential bid.
But whatever transpires during the election build-up, Ma still has a very good chance of winning next year, partly because of his personal popularity and partly because of the changeovers that periodically occur in every two-party democracy.
But in order to stay the course and not jeopardize his victory chances, Ma must avoid getting cornered on the independence-unification issue, keeping his personal belief and that of his party locked far away from public scrutiny.
This will be a big ask, but he has given himself a head start by beginning the race early and on his own terms. Democratic Progressive Party candidate Frank Hsieh (
But in his haste to take the initiative Ma must be careful not to reveal too much of his hand too early, as doing so will provide a wily campaigner like Hsieh with the ammunition to fully expose any shortcomings in Ma's agenda and shoot down his presidential dream.
Richard Hazeldine is a writer based in Taipei.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS