The Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) response to allegations that it harbors sympathy for China boggles the mind.
Instead of getting red in the face, the KMT's lawmakers need to take a long, hard look at why many Taiwanese question their motives -- and at why they react in such a manner.
The latest KMT outburst occurred yesterday, when a Ministry of Foreign Affairs official said that Taiwan's diplomatic relations with Costa Rica, which began in 1944, have reached a crossroads.
Foreign Minister James Huang (
According to foreign ministry officials, Costa Rica has been in close contact with China as it needs Beijing's support to realize its goal of becoming a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council.
Upon learning that Taiwan-Costa Rica relations might be in danger, KMT legislators, as usual, were quick to fault the DPP government.
KMT Legislator John Chiang (
However, the KMT never seems to utter a harsh word against China, which, after all, schemes incessantly to reduce Taiwan's space in the international community.
Of course the administration and the foreign ministry should not be exempt from criticism.
But in cases such as the ties with Costa Rica where Taiwan is clearly being set upon by China, the KMT invariably chooses to slam the government instead of aiming at the real target -- the despots in Beijing.
Taiwan is an independent state. The first reaction of patriotic Taiwanese should therefore be to denounce China's malignant suppression, not condemn their own government.
It is no secret that China is adopting a two-track strategy toward Taiwan, offering friendship on the one hand while increasing its military intimidation and hindering Taiwan's diplomatic space on the other.
During former KMT chairman Lien Chan's (
But most Taiwanese would prefer that China stop its efforts to constrict Taiwan's international space over any "help" that the dictators in Beijing might deign to provide.
However, as China is unlikely to leave Taiwan alone, the KMT should at least stop harboring fantasies about Chinese benevolence.
Taiwan's political parties should cast aside partisan differences and work in concert to safeguard the nation's diplomatic future interests and dignity.
Or is that too much to ask of the KMT?
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS