We need to cut former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
His upbringing has fashioned him in such a way that an awakening is -- and will always be -- beyond his reach. We humble Taiwanese daily reflect on how gullible we were to believe that dictator Chiang Kai-shek (
However, Ma has been and will always be spared "enlightenment." His deep-pan-blue background, his ethnicity, his colonialist attitude, his Harvard education and, most of all, his "movie star" image, are beyond reproach.
How can we ask him to turn against his father's dying wish and renounce the goal of eventual "reunification"?
How can we expect him to twist his tongue and speak proficient Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese) or think like us when there is not a drop of Aboriginal blood in him? (Of course, this needs to be qualified, for I have heard that former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
How can we expect Ma to allow the budget and the arms procurement bill to cruise through the legislature when he browbeats us with his colonialist superiority, which defines him as the conqueror and us as the conquered?
His deep-pan-blue forbears financed his Harvard law education with the money stolen from poor Taiwanese.
Naturally, they enjoyed his loyalty as he acted as a student spy and raised his persecuting voice against Taiwanese political activists at home and abroad. This loyalty is undoubtedly ingrained in his being and has become part of his DNA -- which is why he will continue to frustrate the interests of Taiwanese.
Furthermore, he is a pretty chap and can proudly say that he has amassed a not inconsequential following of termagants who invariably shout for joy as he jogs by them in his shorts. Some of these are his most ardent defenders in the legislature, willing to go to the most ridiculous extremes to hen-peck government officials during hearings with the most unfathomable nonsense. With friends like these, how can one help but be puffed up?
In view of all this, when we question his "core values," when we are amazed by his fawning comments on the economic achievements of the Singaporean regime (which overlook its authoritarianism), when we are puzzled by his facial expression after his disastrous meeting with Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
Quite to the contrary, he will continue to smirk at us and to despise us -- he simply can't help it.
Yang Chunhui
Salt Lake City, Utah
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS