We need to cut former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
His upbringing has fashioned him in such a way that an awakening is -- and will always be -- beyond his reach. We humble Taiwanese daily reflect on how gullible we were to believe that dictator Chiang Kai-shek (
However, Ma has been and will always be spared "enlightenment." His deep-pan-blue background, his ethnicity, his colonialist attitude, his Harvard education and, most of all, his "movie star" image, are beyond reproach.
How can we ask him to turn against his father's dying wish and renounce the goal of eventual "reunification"?
How can we expect him to twist his tongue and speak proficient Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese) or think like us when there is not a drop of Aboriginal blood in him? (Of course, this needs to be qualified, for I have heard that former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
How can we expect Ma to allow the budget and the arms procurement bill to cruise through the legislature when he browbeats us with his colonialist superiority, which defines him as the conqueror and us as the conquered?
His deep-pan-blue forbears financed his Harvard law education with the money stolen from poor Taiwanese.
Naturally, they enjoyed his loyalty as he acted as a student spy and raised his persecuting voice against Taiwanese political activists at home and abroad. This loyalty is undoubtedly ingrained in his being and has become part of his DNA -- which is why he will continue to frustrate the interests of Taiwanese.
Furthermore, he is a pretty chap and can proudly say that he has amassed a not inconsequential following of termagants who invariably shout for joy as he jogs by them in his shorts. Some of these are his most ardent defenders in the legislature, willing to go to the most ridiculous extremes to hen-peck government officials during hearings with the most unfathomable nonsense. With friends like these, how can one help but be puffed up?
In view of all this, when we question his "core values," when we are amazed by his fawning comments on the economic achievements of the Singaporean regime (which overlook its authoritarianism), when we are puzzled by his facial expression after his disastrous meeting with Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
Quite to the contrary, he will continue to smirk at us and to despise us -- he simply can't help it.
Yang Chunhui
Salt Lake City, Utah
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS