Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall was officially renamed National Taiwan Democracy Memorial Hall (
Friends of the late dictator Chiang Kai-shek's (
It seems impossible to persuade such people that democratic countries shouldn't have memorial halls dedicated to dictators. That this is a source of embarrassment for a country such as Taiwan is simply too much for the worshipers at Chiang's temple to make sense of.
If you speak to them about how Chiang murdered countless innocent people by sending troops to Taiwan during the 228 Incident, or how he tore apart families during his White Terror rule in the 1950s and 1960s or how a single man's will took the lives of thousands of people, Chiang's defenders choose not to hear. They say that talk of these incidents constitutes slander of the great Chiang and that no such things ever happened. Or they try their best to rationalize the brutality of his actions by saying that "those decisions were thrust upon him by extraordinary times."
Just as religious belief cannot be debated in purely rational terms, Chiang's worshipers choose to turn a deaf ear to reasonable arguments because of their pious faith in their god. For this kind of ignorant loyalty, I have nothing but the harshest condemnation.
The problem is that some pan-blue politicians have realized that there are still many Chiang worshipers among Taiwan's population who are incapable of independent thought. Sensing an opportunity in the renaming proposal, they have taken advantage of it in an attempt to serve their own purposes.
These politicians have clearly already abandoned Chiang's policy of retaking China from the communists, but they still appear to care a lot about whether or not his memorial hall is renamed. Therefore they take the anti-dictatorial sentiment that has emerged in Taiwan, and which is an important part of transitional justice, and try to paint it as something ugly. They have three main avenues of attack in this smear campaign.
First, they say that renaming the hall stirs up ethnic conflict. However, I have some questions about this assertion. Unless it is the case that all Mainlanders defend Chiang's dictatorial rule and want his temple preserved, and that all localized Taiwanese love democracy and want the hall renamed, changing the name of the hall cannot cause ethnic opposition. But are all Mainlanders really willing to have their ethnic group hijacked by pan-blue politicians? Chiang also killed many Mainlander intellectuals in the 1950s, and his White Terror was certainly not dedicated to oppressing any single ethnic group.
Second, pan-blue politicians say that renaming the hall is an electioneering ploy on the part of the pan-green camp. This is a bizarre claim, unless we accept that a majority of voters are in favor of the proposal to rename the hall. If the proposal is so universally popular, then why are pan-blue politicians so blatantly disregarding public opinion?
In democratic countries, the public's will is the basis for the government's actions. I truly hope that the administration of President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) takes elections into consideration. Wouldn't this mean that Taiwanese everywhere have already woken up from their Chiang-imposed stupor and are alert and attentive? But today there are still many people who have been brainwashed by the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) old state education system. This is the main reason why the heavily fascist pan-blue parties have a majority and can do as they please in the legislature.
Third, pan-blue politicians say the name change was purely ideological. I freely admit that renaming the hall was about democratic ideology. But is it not also imposing ideology to deify a dictator as "savior of the people, helmsman of the age and hero of the world," and construct a grand palace-like memorial hall for his personal worship for 27 years?
Dictators the world over must eventually be judged by history. That the renaming of a memorial to a dictator has created such a powerful backlash in Taiwan is evidence that our democracy is still young. We have to work harder to promote education about democracy. Because of this ongoing process, the emergence of the National Taiwan Democracy Memorial Hall is all the more meaningful.
Lee Hsiao-feng is a history professor at Shih Hsin University.
Translated by Marc Langer
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS