The National Communications Commission (NCC), in fining SET-TV NT$1 million (US$30,000) for airing a 228 Incident documentary that contained erroneous archival footage, has shown that it cannot be trusted to conduct its affairs in an impartial, let alone intelligible, fashion.
Its partisan decision amounts to an attack on freedom of speech -- in the sense that it intimidates media workers and program producers into a level of perfection that approaches the fantastic. No longer, it seems, is there the freedom to make mistakes that can be atoned for by an apology, a promise to do better and a damaged reputation.
This chilling effect could turn out to be pronounced. The media make mistakes all the time in a variety of contexts. This inexactitude is an unfortunate fact of life for an industry with little time to maneuver. The question that follows in this brave new era is which mistakes will be picked up, by whom and for what political purposes.
If each of the nation's media organizations -- regardless of political leaning -- are now to be held to this standard, we can expect a big increase in the number of incidents resulting in fines.
It is not clear if the NCC's members have any concept of precedent. If they do, then their actions are a sinister throwback to a less liberal era and should be opposed by all media outlets. If they do not, then they are a sad joke and the agency should be addressed as such at every available opportunity.
When the Government Information Office's role in monitoring the media was taken away, there were high -- perhaps naive -- hopes that the replacement would be a truly independent force, free of unreasonable influence from all political parties.
Instead, the NCC is a politically partisan body because it is made up of people appointed by the parties in proportion to the number of seats each party has in the legislature. It therefore cannot be trusted to make judgments on media matters with the public as its primary interest, and even less so when media outlets attempt to address sensitive political matters.
The NCC has been declared an unconstitutional body by the Council of Grand Justices, though for reasons only understood by the justices themselves it has been allowed to continue operations and will do for some time until the law is changed.
The NCC's stupidity offers stark evidence of what will happen if the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) continues with its campaign to turn the Central Election Commission -- and any other body that requires expertise and independence to function properly -- into partisan agencies.
And this is, indeed, yet another reminder that the ideological nature of the KMT has not changed since Taiwan democratized, and that many of its fellow travelers in academia and elsewhere are ready to turn back the clock as soon as a chance presents itself. Democracy, non-partisan institutions of state, due process: These terms are of no value to the hardliners that run the KMT except when used as political slogans.
Appointees to the NCC who respect the principles of independence and separation of powers should quit and let the body conduct its affairs in an even more transparently biased and inept fashion. Those who stay and lend it the facade of a balanced executive agency will only further injure their credibility.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS