What will the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) presidential hopeful Frank Hsieh's (
International competitiveness begins at home. As international competition strategist and Harvard professor Michael Porter says: "Paradoxically, the enduring competitive advantages in a global economy lie increasingly in local things -- knowledge, relationships and motivation that distant rivals cannot match."
A company's competitive advantage is the most important factor affecting its competitiveness, and such advantages are determined by the effective use of production factors. This requires constant innovation, which in turn requires cooperation with academia.
Collaboration between industrial and academic circles thus becomes the source of competitiveness. Silicon Valley in California, Research Triangle Park in North Carolina and Hsinchu Science Park are all successful examples.
Such collaboration applies not only to the high-tech industry but also to the agricultural and general industries. Taiwan's achievements in this respect are much greater than China's, and should not be underestimated. Taiwan's orchid exhibition this year, another successful example of industry-academia collaboration, resulted in orders worth several billion US dollars.
Second, the world is not flat. Many Taiwanese treat Thomas Friedman's bestseller The World Is Flat as their Bible and use it to criticize the government's business policy. However, Harvard professor Pankaj Ghemawat says that this and similar books, such as The Death of Distance by Frances Cairncross, are only sensationalist statements.
Ghemawat says foreign direct investment accounted for just 10 percent of total global investments between 2003 and 2005, which means that 90 percent of investments actually were domestic. If the world were flat, proportions would be reversed.
Other areas related to internationalization such as international migration, and international telecommunications, research and education, charitable donations, patents, stock investments and trade account for less than 10 percent of GDP. It is evident that the world is not flat.
Third, the Chinese market is one of Taiwan's markets, not the only one. Today, about 70 percent of foreign investments by Taiwanese companies is concentrated on China, the highest in the world. This runs counter to common sense. You should not put all your eggs in one basket.
Some commentators like to cite South Korea as an example, but the fact is that Seoul has been promoting global investments in recent years. Hyundai Motor Co is the second-largest company in India, a huge market of 1.1 billion people, and white wares from LG Electronics and Samsung Electronics have a 30 percent to 40 percent market share.
According to the Indian government's official statistics, by the end of March, South Korea's total investment in India was about 70 times more than that of Taiwan. The Indian market is gigantic, and it is highly complementary to Taiwan. By investing in China, Taiwan can eventually enter the US market. By investing in India, it will eventually be able to enter the emerging Central Asian, Eastern and even Western European markets. India is thus the best jumping board for the global arrangement of Taiwanese businesspeople.
Hopefully, Hsieh's team will remember these three principles for promoting global arrangement on a Taiwanese foundation and create another economic miracle for Taiwan.
Mark Wen is a professor in the department of civil education and leadership at National Taiwan Normal University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS