In 1991, the Democratic Progressive Party penned the "Taiwan Independence Clause," laying out its goal to found a sovereign and independent Republic of Taiwan. In 1999 however, as it geared up to win the 2000 election, the DPP adopted the "Resolution on Taiwan's future."
This resolution emphasizes that "Taiwan is a sovereign independent country," but does not reject the use of the name "the Republic of China," placing it within the "two Chinas" framework.
DPP Chairman Yu Shyi-kun and others now propose amending or abolishing this resolution and replacing it with a "resolution on making Taiwan a normal country."
The goal of this new resolution is to return to the platform the DPP was founded on -- to establish a Republic of Taiwan and promote normalization of the country.
The resolution on Taiwan's future still states that Taiwan is the Republic of China and de facto independent.
Now a resolution on making Taiwan a normal country is needed to take Taiwan toward de jure independence, through adopting a new constitution and abandoning the name "Republic of China" in the titles of state-owned companies, turning Taiwan from the name of a geographical place into the name of a country.
The former means "the Republic of China on Taiwan," the latter means "Taiwan is Taiwan."
Some people say such changes don't reflect the opinion of the people or are not realistic. However, many polls have shown that more than 60 percent of the people consider themselves Taiwanese, with less than 10 percent considering themselves Chinese.
More than 70 percent of Taiwanese consider Taiwan a sovereign, independent country, while more than 80 percent want Taiwan to join the UN under the name of Taiwan.
The percentage of people who want Taiwan to become part of China is less than 6.6 percent.
The DPP, with democracy as its core value, should not only respect the will of the people, but should also lead the way.
Twenty years ago, at the founding of the DPP, the party advocated founding a Republic of Taiwan.
Even earlier, people such as Peng Ming-min (
The pan-green public look forward to normalization of the country, but because of the pan-blue majority in the Legislative Yuan, it is hard to pass resolutions on name changes or a new constitution.
If the DPP can't clearly state its goals by adopting the resolution on making Taiwan a normal country and by abandoning the label of the Republic of China, then how can the people believe in the party's determination to promote the normalization of Taiwan?
How can the public believe that the party is making an effort for real change on a larger scope?
Only if the DPP can first reach consensus and determination within the party about normalization can it obtain the support of the people and achieve this goal.
Now that the DPP appears to have united behind Frank Hsieh (
Such a resolution can lessen the worries of the voters of the pan-green camp about statements like "a constitutional one China."
This will bring the supporters of the pan-green camp closer together, and facilitate unity and consensus.
Re-establishing the goal of normalization will also help the DPP distinguish itself clearly from Chinese Nationalist Party presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
It can also clear up misunderstandings that may have arisen following the use of phrases like "a constitutional one China," and send a clear sign to the international community.
Hsieh promised in the primary elections to "abandon one China," and move towards a constitutional Taiwan.
The right direction for this nation is toward a Republic of Taiwan.
Cao Changqing is a political commentator based in the US.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS