Taiwan's bid for full WHO membership was thwarted on Monday after the World Health Assembly (WHA) adopted a motion by a vote of 148 to 17 to exclude the issue from its agenda.
China was quick to hail the decision as a political victory backing its claims to Taiwan. Beijing's attitude made it amply clear that China viewed the issue as political from the start and that it was not concerned about the health rights of Taiwanese.
However, those who voted against Taiwan's bid for full membership in the WHO cannot simply wash their hands and walk away. They are equally guilty of turning a blind eye to the rights of 23 million people and for leaving a missing link in the global health framework by yielding to political pressure and excluding Taiwan.
The organization as a whole and its individual member states seem unbothered by the contradiction between a body's mandate to prioritize global health issues -- above political agendas -- and blocking an entire nation from that body.
China and its supporters argue that Taiwan is not left out of the network because China has signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the WHO, magnanimously promising to look after Taiwanese.
Forget politics. The reality of Taiwan's health system is that it is completely and utterly independent of China. The French might as well promise to protect the health of Germans.
Chinese Health Minister Gao Qiang (
What many do not know or choose to ignore is that the MOU restricts Taiwan's right to attend WHO forums and workshops on the latest developments in the diagnosis and control of pandemics and other vital issues. It also restricts the status of officials Taiwan is allowed to send and grants China the authority to approve or reject Taiwan's applications to attend workshops.
China has repeatedly delayed its approval of Taiwan's applications, even when turned in needlessly early, so that the Taiwanese representatives would not receive the go-ahead in time to take part in these conferences.
The SARS outbreak in 2003 claimed 73 lives in Taiwan, making it the country with the third-highest number of deaths after China and Hong Kong. Taiwan was forced to cope with SARS alone for about two months before the WHO sent two health experts to help deal with the crisis. Bizarrely, the WHO had to wait for the go-ahead from Beijing officials that have no control over Taiwan's health system and other agencies that were involved in containing the SARS virus.
How long will the WHO and its member states allow Taiwan to remain in this untenable position? One way or another, Taiwan is better off without China's magnanimity.
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS