Taiwan is a thriving democracy, has a vibrant economy and offers its citizens universal health care. The nation sends young medical doctors to African nations such as Burkina Faso and Malawi to improve health standards. It even offers to send peacekeepers to the world's hot spots, if allowed.
In other words, Taiwan is eager to be an active member of the international community, yet it has been locked out of nearly all global organizations.
WHO Director-General Margaret Chan (
The nation is growing tired of such lame excuses, because, as almost everyone is aware, China is the real culprit behind Taiwan's international isolation.
To exclude the 23 million Taiwanese from the WHO, to deprive them of the universal rights to the prevention of and treatment of infectious disease in a global outbreak is simply morally wrong.
In 2003, when Taiwan was hit by SARS, the WHO initially refused to offer medical aid and vaccines to Taiwan. Taiwanese health authorities had to go to the Internet to search for information about SARS and more than 35 Taiwanese perished because of delays in treatment.
In effect, excluding Taiwan from the WHO will leave a hole in the global epidemic prevention network because bacteria and viruses know no boundaries.
It is not up to Chan to decide whether Taiwan is a nation or not: Under the criteria established in the 1933 Montevideo Convention, Taiwan is a sovereign state with effective control of a territory.
To sidestep the issue of sovereignty, Taiwan applied to become an observer at World Health Assembly as a health "entity" in 1997. For 10 consecutive years, however, because of opposition from China, its application has never even been put on the health assembly's agenda.
This year, the government decided to apply for entry to the WHO as a full member under the name Taiwan. WHO rules and regulations state that membership applications should be put on the agency's agenda and brought to the attention of member states. None of these steps were taken and the application was rejected before it ever had a chance.
To the great disappointment of the Taiwanese, the US government has refused to support Taiwan's full membership in the WHO, lamely citing its "one China" policy.
But let us go back to the basic principle of the WHO, which is "health for all." If a doctor refuses to treat a patient because of his or her political views, he or she will be censored by the medical board. By the same token it is unconscionable for the WHO and its member states to exclude Taiwan.
The universal right of the 23 million Taiwanese to the prevention and treatment of infectious disease is not and should not be a political issue, but a human rights and moral issue. Simply put, it is morally wrong to treat Taiwanese like second-class citizens.
Mei-chin van der Wees is a writer based in Washington.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS