Beijing's announcement on Friday that the Olympic torch would arrive in Taipei from Vietnam before traveling on to Hong Kong was nothing more than a politically motivated scheme to sabotage Taiwan's sovereignty.
The route announced by Beijing implied that Taiwan was part of a Chinese "domestic route" largely because the next stop after Taipei was to be Hong Kong, which is officially known as a Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China.
The Taiwanese government's immediate rejection of the route as politically motivated was understandable.
However, the administration of President Chen Shui-bian must come up with more effective measures and strategies in order to counteract Beijing's so-called "Olympic diplomacy."
Beijing's scheme to use next year's Summer Olympics to push forward its international campaign of "peaceful development" and "building a harmonious global society" has both international and domestic implications.
The Chinese leaders are using the Olympics to distract international attention from growing domestic problems such as the public unrest that has accompanied the country's rapid economic growth, the corruption of public officials and the unequal distribution of wealth between the rich and the poor.
Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) is also relying on the Olympics to stir more Chinese nationalism in order to further consolidate his position as president.
Chinese leaders hope that the Summer Olympics will affirm that the country is well on its way to recovering its past glory and rebuilding its status as a great power.
As for Taiwan, China will use the Olympics as an opportunity to attempt to propagate its fantasy of "a unified China."
Taiwan must work diligently and continuously to counteract China's misleading Olympic propaganda.
The Chinese government has already attempted to fault Taiwan for rejecting the torch route by claiming that Taipei had politicized what should be a purely sporting event.
Taiwan needs to make its side of the issue known to avoid being labeled by the international community as a troublemaker, even in the athletic arena.
Furthermore, Taiwan should utilize all resources available to remind the world of Beijing's military ambitions, abuses of religious freedom and human rights violations.
Others have already sounded warning's about Chinese abuses.
US actress Mia Farrow has called for Beijing to take responsibility for doing nothing to oppose the Sudanese government's ethnic cleansing campaign in Darfur.
French presidential candidate Francois Bayrou publicly pledged that if elected, he would place more pressure on Beijing to stop the genocide in Darfur.
Members of Falun Gong work tirelessly to remind the world of China's attempts to crush the organization.
Taiwan needs to join these voices to ensure that China truly becomes the "responsible stakeholder" it claims to be.
While millions of eyes are focused on the Summer Olympics' sporting events, Beijing will seize the opportunity to convince the world that it has evolved in a democratic and civilized manner.
Taiwan needs to mobilize all available resources to debunk this fallacy. It needs to show the international community that behind the glossy facade of the Olympics, China's many faults remain.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
RSS