Sunday saw the conclusion of the latest cross-strait forum held in Beijing between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
The forum came just days after the nation's 11th attempt to gain admission to the WHO was rejected because of China's interference.
It also came as China last week -- once again -- tried to deny Taiwan's sovereignty by making it the first leg of the "domestic route" for the torch in the build-up to next year's Beijing Olympics.
And it comes after seven years of Chinese authorities ignoring the democratic government of Taiwan.
That China has almost 1,000 ballistic missiles pointing at their homeland didn't seem to bother the delegates from Taiwan in the least.
These are the same KMT and People First Party lawmakers who swore allegiance to the Republic of China and vowed to uphold its integrity, but stand there like dummies while Chinese leaders denigrate the nation and treat them like provincial delegates.
That these people do not represent the government of Taiwan and have no authority to discuss and seal such deals didn't seem to take anything away from the occasion.
Lien and his friends could return to Taiwan with a few more meaningless economic concessions from their "friends" across the Strait, but the few crumbs that Beijing has thrown at them are just the latest chapter in China's "united front" strategy that aims to suck the life out of Taiwan's economic autonomy until the nation -- and its independence -- is swallowed up by its neighbor.
All the measures are designed to do is prevent Taiwan's dynamic business sector from reaching out further around the globe, help China secure even more of Taiwan's investment capital and steal Taiwan's know-how and intellectual property.
We have already seen an example with the fruit exports that the KMT agreed on with China during one of its trips. Not long after the first batches of Taiwanese fruit arrived in China, the Chinese market was swamped with low-quality fakes and imitations -- all claiming to be from Taiwan -- hurting the revenues and reputation of Taiwanese farmers.
The behavior of the opposition since Lien's first trip to China in 2005 has been a thorn in the side of the government. But it is particularly hard to know how to deal with legislators who participate in subversive activity and deal directly with the government of a hostile state.
Jailing them or revoking passports would lead the former political prisoners and democracy activists in the Democratic Progressive Party into a domestic conflict for which they are ill-prepared.
The best we can ultimately hope for in a democracy is that the electorate will see through the faux loyalty of these opportunists and punish those who block important legislative matters at home to cosy up to a regime of autocrats.
One of the great hopes for the new legislative electoral system is that it will help dispose of some of the flotsam that pose as legislators.
In order to facilitate this, the names of the 30 lawmakers who attended the forum and those who visit China on a regular basis should be publicized so that the electorate can make a clear and informed choice between legislators who are proud to represent Taiwan and those who are more interested in singing the praises of China.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS