In his characteristic golden-framed spectacles and simple attire, former archbishop Desmond Tutu charmed the local audience with a light-hearted joke that showed why he is regarded by so many as a master of his own class.
Speaking after Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng's (
After the staff removed the podium and a massive bouquet of flowers that would have blocked Tutu's figure, I found myself face to face with the man whose name is often linked to that of human rights and political activists such as Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King and Mahatma Ghandi.
Unlike South Africa's Mandela, who, at 1.93m, is an imposing figure, Tutu is small and unimposing, but exudes an air of calmness and confidence.
But one shouldn't be misled into thinking this gentle figure lacks the fiery spirit and talent for passionate speaking that great leaders possess.
After a delightful joke at the beginning of his speech, Tutu mesmerized the auditorium with simple, lucid language that was devoid of rhetorical hyperbole.
He spoke in his own dignified, unrushed and truly powerful style.
It was at this point that the greatness of the man became clear to me.
The countless awards and honors he has received around the world can't illustrate this as well as his endeavor to reach each individual with his words, through the most sincere and open way.
He set a relaxed yet somber atmosphere and began to talk about the courage and integrity of the mothers who lost their sons to the hands of government death squads during apartheid.
It was in his measured, trembling voice that he described the tears and pain of those who confessed atrocities in hearings arranged by then president Mandela after the 1994 historical election that put South Africa on the path toward freedom and equality.
With compassion and strength, he delivered his message to Taiwan, quoting the words of poet-philosopher George Santayana: "Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it."
Tutu shared his experience presiding over hearings held by South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission, a court-like body assembled after the end of apartheid.
In the hearings, victims of violence came forward with their horrifying experiences and perpetrators of violence confessed and requested amnesty from prosecution.
Tutu said that reconciliation is only possible when a population recognizes the crimes that have been committed.
During his chairmanship at the commission, 5,392 people were refused amnesty and 849 were pardoned.
Tutu explained the criticism he faced that perpetrators had been let off too lightly.
He said, however, that those who had applied for amnesty had taken the step of admitting they had committed violent crimes.
Tutu firmly believes the hearings were the right choice for a delicate time marked by a pained and angered population.
All the applications were made in public and confessions and testimonies were broadcasted live on television and radio.
Tutu said: "There was a penalty. Maybe not the same kind you got in justice."
"But the impunity lies in that the perpetrators had to admit openly what they had done," he said.
Speaking about Taiwan, Tutu commemorated the victims of the 228 Incident and praised the courage of those who were wrongly convicted during the "Formosa Incident" two decades ago, such as Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chu (陳菊). Tutu emphasized that despite Taiwan's progress toward reconciliation, it was sad to see that no arrests had been made in the gruesome murder of former DPP chairman Lin I-hsiung's (林義雄) family.
His mother and twin daughters were murdered on Feb. 28, 1980, while he was in prison for human rights activism.
The Nobel laureate's words have come at a crucial time for Taiwan. Our society is grappling with the legacy left by former dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and is trying to move forward toward national reconciliation.
The effort toward reconciliation and healing in South Africa has been sincere. Taiwan, by comparison, is fixated by the notion of reconciliation.
The word has been frivolously tossed around by politicians, who treat it like a tool and cheap commodity.
They overemphasize the importance of "moving on" without sincerely examining the issue of reconciliation.
It is absurd that after all these decades of social and economic prosperity and progress, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) still refuses to offer a clear explanation of the role it played during more than 40 years of dictatorship under the Chiang family, in which tens of thousands of social elites, students and political dissidents were killed, imprisoned, or disappeared, their fates forever unknown.
While vigorously waving his banner of peace and integration, former KMT chairman and presidential hopeful Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) clearly needs a history lesson.
To this day, Ma has offered no formal apology to the 228 victims and their families.
As an ethnic Mainlander, Ma exclaimed in a rally that Taiwan would reach "true reconciliation" once he was elected president.
Quoting the archbishop's solemn words in his speech, "we human beings are not gods; we can't let bygones be bygones."
Reflecting on the political reality in Taiwan today, it sounded undeniably true, yet painful.
However, I think Tutu's journey to Taiwan has sown the seeds for the beginning of a new awakening.
His compassionate, calm and candid approach should be a model for raising questions about the fundamental conditions of our society.
His words lead us to rethink the past and the direction we are headed in.
After decades of hatred and tension, how do we achieve true peace through reconciliation? And what is the true definition of reconciliation? What does it cost to tell those who seek retribution and revenge to stop and instead find solace in reparation?
These are questions that Desmond Tutu has handed to us as gifts, promising the possibility of healing, but not promising an easy route.
The government, as well as all levels of society, must contemplate the moral voice of this icon, who in his usual style deconstructed Taiwan's political issues with a simple remark that went straight to the heart of the situation.
"The question is how do you make up for the pain, suffering and loss?" he asked.
"You really are not going to have a proper country until you deal with your past," he said.
James Tu
Taipei
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS