Is that a real Coach Handbag? Is that medicine I need for my blood pressure real? I hope so.
If I write a song or a book, will I be properly compensated for it? Will my children be able work in jobs that reward them for their creativity and hard work?
Unfortunately, some people believe that protecting intellectual property rights (IPR) only means that they have to pay for a product they would prefer to get for free or for next to nothing.
Most consider intellectual property as extending to music, movies, or books. But they also cover handbags, designer clothing and more scarily, medicines.
Of course it's true: We should pay for what we use. But it is important to understand that protecting intellectual property is really about protecting all of us.
Patents, copyrights and trademarks are there for two reasons. The first is to let the consumer know what he or she is buying, whether it is a designer handbag, a piece of expensive electronic equipment, or life-saving medicine.
The second reason is to protect the legitimate rights of the producer of products.
Yes, the author should be paid for his work, the inventor for her discovery and the designer for his creativity.
That, in turn, helps to foster innovation. And innovation is what drives our economies, raises our standard of living and improves our health care.
If you don't believe me, look at the statistics: The World Economic Forum reported that the 20 countries perceived to have the strongest intellectual property protection were among the world's top 27 countries in terms of economic growth opportunities.
In contrast, the countries with the worst intellectual property protection were at the bottom of the pile among the bottom 36 countries. It makes sense.
Most of the growth of the global economy in the last century -- a 20-fold increase -- was due to innovation. Now that 70 percent of global output is generated by services, innovation has become even more important.
Both the US and Taiwan have a strong interest in protecting and fostering our innovators.
For Taiwan, in particular, the future is clear with respect to economic development. The nation's high-tech industries, scientists and engineers -- of which you are justifiably proud -- will lead to economic growth and development. Encouraging and protecting their discoveries and innovations are key to a prosperous future.
Copyright protections for Taiwan's musicians, writers and artists -- whether they be world famous or local favorites -- are important to keep them creating and contributing to Taiwan's rich culture.
And yes, when we take medicine, whether it be for a headache, high blood pressure, or even the flu, we all deserve to know what exactly we are buying.
Taiwan is taking steps to improve its intellectual property protection. The Taiwan Intellectual Property Office under the Ministry of Economic Affairs, along with many others in government, industry and education, are working hard on this important issue. Not only are they improving protections for all of us, they are helping to build a prosperous future for the nation.
Best wishes to everyone on World Intellectual Property Day.
Stephen Young is the director of the American Institute in Taiwan.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS