The end of April approaches and the newly elected Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Wu Po-hsiung (
This has always been the characteristic anomaly of the KMT -- a party that claims to be interested in Taiwan but consistently snubs localization. One has the feeling that the KMT's preferential attitude and mindset remains that "If it is good for the PRC, then it is good for Taiwan."
Wu of course only recently got the job as chairman because former chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Yes, pseudo Mr. Clean Ma is now on trial. We all remember him because in true double standard fashion, with faulty logic thrown in to boot, Ma was the one who insisted that President Chen Shui-bian (
And now that Ma has been indicted, he decides to make a run for the presidency.
However, let us return to Wu, who is following the lead of other pan-blue camp leaders like former KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) to cross the Taiwan Strait to find out what is good for Taiwan.
There is a tremendous irony involved here. Does anyone remember Sun Yat-sen (
He is that distinguished person whose picture adorns most government offices here and who is also allegedly revered in China.
Sun is most known for preaching the Three Principles of the People -- democracy, nationalism and livelihood. Remember those?
It is almost 100 years since Sun began touting those principles, so it is all the more ironic that those who profess to honor Sun are the very ones who have resisted putting those principles into practice. Democracy came to Taiwan not because of the KMT, but in spite of it. Democracy has still not come to the PRC.
The last prediction was that it might come after another 100 years. A more blunt way of saying it is: "Sun's principles of democracy are fine and should be adopted, but not while we are in power."
So Wu will head to China to find out what is good for Taiwan. Remember when Lien and Soong made their pilgrimages back to their (not Taiwan's) motherland? Sun's words about democracy, nationalism and livelihood were strictly taboo, verboten, mention-at-risk-of-getting-kicked-out.
If I were a betting man, I would lay heavy odds that while Wu may bow to some pictures of Sun, he won't dare to mention Sun's principles of democracy.
And Sun? He must be twisting and turning in his grave.
Jerome Keating is a Taiwan-based writer.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS