For next year's presidential election, the two major political camps' approaches mirror the bipolarization of their views regarding Taiwan's future.
With four contenders vying for the prized spot to represent the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), the party launched a primary process that could be at least setting new standards for Taiwan's politics -- if not quite worthy of a mature democracy.
For the first time, a presidential primary-election debate took place publicly with a panel of political experts firing pointed questions at each DPP hopeful. Most important, there were follow-up questions to nail down specifics.
For a party that's notorious for its unsuccessful candidates' propensity to bolt, this primary should provide a window into the extent democratic values have taken root in the DPP.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) obviously doesn't share the DPP's enthusiasm for treasuring the presidential election as Taiwan's most important democratic process.
For the KMT, democracy seems but an inconvenience to be finessed. As a consequence, democracy got tossed out of the window the instant the party's interests were threatened.
Former chairman Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) presidential candidacy was by and large a foregone conclusion until he was indicted for embezzling special account funds. That moment marked the end of a period of more than a year during which the KMT flirted with democracy internally. No sooner had Ma's indictment been handed down than the pan-blue camp became unhinged.
At a recent political rally, a look-alike of the late dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) stood benevolently next to Ma. If this bizarre scene made the hair on most Taiwanese necks stand on end, Ma's speech glorifying the "accomplishments" of Chiang while characterizing the dictator's handling of the 228 Incident and the White Terror as mere "blemishes" could only make them ill.
Further buttressed therefore is the suggestion that the KMT is living in a make-believe world -- the obvious rub to the party's constant insistence on the physical existence of a Republic of China that encompasses today's China, Taiwan and Mongolia.
This is but one of the numerous "highlights" of Ma and company's outrageous behavior following Ma's fall from grace.
Within hours of Ma unleashing a shockwave by signaling his intention to run for the presidency as the response to his legal woes, the KMT's Central Steering Committee rushed through a resolution to rescind an anti-corruption rule which, as a twist of fate, was originally designed by Ma to deprive party members of the right to hold public office while under indictment for corruption.
The resolution preserves Ma's chance to be the party's presidential candidate. But the pan-blue's fixation on Ma's candidacy doesn't stop there.
Intending to forestall future obstacles, the KMT is mulling the possibility of amending the party charter to do away with the "conviction intolerance" rule. Ma did his part to encourage this by announcing that a criminal conviction would not deter his candidacy.
In the meantime, the pan-blue camp in the legislature has been trying to push through a law that would legitimatize Ma's alleged theft of public funds by legislating retroactively those funds as part of his salary.
Even more treacherously, this year's government budget is being held hostage by the pan-blue legislators in an attempt to force through a bill that would change the composition of the Central Election Commission to ensure its partisan bias towards the pan-blue presidential candidate.
These mind-boggling events notwithstanding, the notion that Ma could eventually direct his campaign from behind bars and pardon himself once elected is still too far fetched.
The KMT has demonstrated the incredible lengths it is prepared to go to regain power even if that means wrecking Taiwan's democracy. Taiwanese must ensure that in time Taiwan's democracy will reciprocate in kind.
Huang Jei-hsuan
California
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS