President Chen Shui-bian (
The WHO charter stipulates that membership is open to all countries, not just those in the UN. For Chen to use his position as head of state and representative of Taiwan's 23 million people to apply for membership is an extremely important first step in the nation's bid to join the WHO. Not only does it highlight that Taiwan is a sovereign and independent nation, but it also makes it clear that Taiwan wants to participate fully in the WHO, and that it is willing and determined to contribute to improving the health of all the world's people.
In consideration of its fundamental and long-term interests, this is the correct course for Taiwan to pursue. This is not the same as applying to be an observer in the World Health Assembly (WHA), which is a sub-organization of the WHO. The benefits of applying to be a full WHO member are far greater than becoming a WHA observer.
Official WHO members enjoy full rights within the organization, whereas observers are more like an audience in a meeting whose participation is greatly limited. Only official members have the right to make proposals, speak and participate. Only they have the right to vote on WHO policies and initiatives, or have people elected to important positions.
All WHO members are countries, whereas that is not necessarily true of observers. Fighting for an observer spot could easily mislead the international community into thinking that Taiwan is not an independent and sovereign nation.
As all this shows, WHO membership is open to all countries. Applicants need a simple majority of votes from WHO members to gain entrance, the same as those applying for WHA observer status. In terms of procedural difficulties, applying to the WHO is no more difficult than applying to the WHA.
Taiwan's biggest obstacle is Chinese opposition. In the past 10 years, Taiwan has humbled itself by applying for observer status in the WHA in order to avoid controversy over its sovereignty dispute with China. Beijing, however, has not responded positively, instead continuing to arrogantly insist Taiwan is a part of China and is not qualified to become a WHO member or WHA observer.
But international law and the plain facts show that Taiwan and China are two unconnected countries, each with its own jurisdiction. Therefore Taiwan wants to apply for WHO membership as a sovereign nation, not for WHA observer status as a "health entity."
In the past we sought to become WHA observers, but we have now entered a new stage of actively pursuing full WHO membership. As long as we choose the right direction, and people work closely together with the government with trust and resolve, our shared determination will see us through to success.
Chen Lung-chu is chairman of the New Century Foundation and director of the Taiwan United Nations Alliance.
Translated by Marc Langer
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
RSS