The US recently concluded a free-trade agreement (FTA) with South Korea. Under the agreement, more than 90 percent of bilateral trade in industrial and consumer goods will become duty-free three years after it comes into force, with remaining tariffs eliminated within 10 years. Council for Economic Planning and Development (CEPD) estimates show that the FTA between the US and South Korea will have an estimated US$2 billion impact on Taiwan, or approximately 5 percent of its total exports, a spokesman of said on Tuesday.
In fact, the agreement will have a domino effect. Regional economic integration will become the major strategy for countries to strengthen their economic competitiveness and attract foreign investment.
As for Taiwan, China's macroeconomic development strategy and the "one China" principle have had a negative effect on Taiwan's participation in the process of regional integration.
Facing Chinese obstructionism, the manner in which Taipei enters FTA negotiations with Washington will be of utmost importance. This strategy can use the WTO's legal system and institutions to develop the FTA with the US.
Washington wants a tighter trade bloc in the region, mostly among APEC members. Its FTA strategy, which focuses on the political, economic and strategic, is meant to protect its interests in the region by developing more dialogues with ASEAN member states.
For its part, Taiwan can use its own prestige in areas such as economic liberty, market openness and geopolitical status as trading chips to highlight the value of regional trade investment. A Taiwan-US FTA would support the formation of an APEC-wide FTA, from which regional development could ensue.
To demonstrate its political will to the US, Taiwan must offer a comprehensive economic liberalization plan and adopt a more realistic strategy to overcome political obstacles. Giving more importance to creating a trade and investment framework in which Taiwan and the US can evolve would be a way to achieve this.
Beside the protection of intellectual property, rice import quotas and limits on access to the nation's pharmaceutical market, Taiwan can offer cooperation on regional investment, ICT standards, financial supervisory systems and training.
The nation needs to build the communication mechanism whereby it can enter into talks with US entrepreneurs in favor of a Taiwan-US FTA.
Tsai Horng ming is the deputy secretary-general of the Chinese National Federation of Industries.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its