One of the biggest problems President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government have faced internationally is how to correct the image of Taiwan as troublemaker in the Taiwan Strait.
Many international observers see Chen's push for explicit Taiwanese independence through a referendum and the introduction of a new constitution as needless provocation of China and thus inherently detrimental to cross-strait interaction.
Americans often stress that since the Bush administration is preoccupied with North Korea and is dependent on China's assistance, Taiwan should refrain from giving Beijing excuses to elicit US pressure on Taiwan.
In some cases, Chen did make surprising announcements of new initiatives in a manner that didn't help his friends in Washington prepare the ground properly and that allowed Chen-haters to make him appear irresponsible or insufficiently aware of how difficult the US position has been.
Therefore, the Bush administration has stressed publicly the terms of "accountability," "responsibility" and "consistency" in connection to Chen.
A serious disjuncture has apparently occurred between Taipei and Washington over timing and judgment -- even if the Chen administration's underlying policies make sense.
There is a balance to be struck, and this has not been recognized sufficiently by the two sides.
Most US policymakers tend to forget that new democracies always struggle to consolidate internally and develop mature party systems. Taiwan is also a unique case in that it faces an increasing Chinese military threat.
Sometimes people overreact to Chen and his administration's actions. Sometimes they merely overlook the China factor and blame all on Chen's politicking.
For example, most people regard "Taiwan-centered consciousness" as a product of the DPP government. In fact, it has been rooted in Taiwanese society since the Japanese era and underwent transformation during the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) authoritarian rule and democratization in the 1990s.
Also, as a popularly elected leader, it's natural for Chen to play to his base -- just as US presidents do on abortion, taxes and national security.
Chen thinks he has been careful in not doing anything that might give Beijing cause to literally go ballistic. And he has criticized Beijing's growing number of missiles targeting Taiwan and the rapid expansion of its military budget as clear violations of the cross-strait "status quo."
Washington instead worries about miscalculations. Most importantly, it is frustrated that Taiwan shows no determination to strengthen its defensive capabilities and seems to take US military assistance in the case of cross-strait conflict for granted.
It's not about right or wrong. It's about how to reinforce Taiwan's message and the necessity of strengthening communication. This involves incorporating a more realistic and effective strategy of public diplomacy to rebuild US-Taiwan relations.
Taiwan needs to mobilize official and civic resources and launch a global campaign to debunk Beijing's line and allow the international community to understand the true purpose of Taiwan's democracy.
Winning the next presidential election is important, but the key is to translate the current growing pains of democracy into a positive image of Taiwan as a beacon for Chinese democracy and a cornerstone of peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region.
The goal for Taiwan's new representative to the US, outgoing Mainland Affairs Council Chairman Joseph Wu (
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS