The problem of plant seed outflows has come into the spotlight once again following China's copying of Taiwan's Black Pearl strain of wax apples. So far, no consensus has been reached on how to deal with this problem.
Apart from Taiwan's geographic environment, it is our variety improvement and technological innovation that have contributed to the excellent quality of our agricultural products. It is interesting to note that Taiwan's agricultural products -- just like the human species -- make up an immigrant society. About 95 percent of local agricultural products have come from abroad, including paddy rice, mangoes, yams and wax apples. Since numerous varieties have already been improved through the knowledge of the Taiwanese people, it is absolutely necessary that their intellectual property rights be protected.
In addition to plant variety and technology, cost is also a key factor to agricultural competitiveness. Since land and labor costs in Taiwan are high, some farmers have chosen to relocate overseas. In the midst of the recent wave of China-bound investment, there are even examples of people with official status taking seed technology across the Taiwan Strait as part of their investment.
This outflow of seeds and technology may damage Taiwan in two ways. First, it may lead to China competing with Taiwan for export markets, and second, Chinese products could be imported and sold on Taiwan's domestic market. To resolve these issues, the government passed the Plant Variety and Plant Seed Act (植物品種及種苗法) in 2004, effectively remedying these problems through intellectual property protection. However, the law has limitations, as it does not allow the application for patent rights on old plant varieties that previously could not be protected.
Even if we implement the most stringent legal requirements, today's technological advancements means that it would be difficult to stop anyone who wants to illegally take seeds out of the country. This means that for advanced nations that follow the rule of law, the key issue is not seed theft, but rather the ability to continue to further develop plant varieties and the related technology and provide protection of these intellectual property rights. The greatest threat to the nation's agricultural sector is the growing crisis in our deteriorating traditional plant breeding skills.
Apart from orchid breeding technology, most plant breeders work in official institutions and primarily in agencies experimenting with the improvement of agricultural products. Most have worked quietly and hard to make a contribution to Taiwan's agricultural miracle without seeking fame. With the rapid progress of gene technology, policies tend to emphasize cutting-edge technology without being able to also maintain traditional agricultural research skills.
This has resulted in a loss of talent and an inability to attract new blood. This means that the ability of existing plant breeders to create new strains is weakened because of extra additional workloads such as providing assistance and information to farmers. If this situation persists for long and the introduction of new and better strains slows, the consequence would be to damage the agricultural sector even more than the current problem of seed outflows.
In addition to the issue of seed outflows, technology outflow is also a concern. The government has an obligation to place appropriate restrictions on civil servants, rather than standing idly by. Agricultural academic groups should take a square look at members providing China with technical assistance, provide solutions for discussion and clarify the issues concerning the relationship between cross-strait academic exchanges and technology transfers to China.
Warren Kuo is a professor in the Department of Agronomy at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Eddy Chang and Lin Ya-ti
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS