The problem of plant seed outflows has come into the spotlight once again following China's copying of Taiwan's Black Pearl strain of wax apples. So far, no consensus has been reached on how to deal with this problem.
Apart from Taiwan's geographic environment, it is our variety improvement and technological innovation that have contributed to the excellent quality of our agricultural products. It is interesting to note that Taiwan's agricultural products -- just like the human species -- make up an immigrant society. About 95 percent of local agricultural products have come from abroad, including paddy rice, mangoes, yams and wax apples. Since numerous varieties have already been improved through the knowledge of the Taiwanese people, it is absolutely necessary that their intellectual property rights be protected.
In addition to plant variety and technology, cost is also a key factor to agricultural competitiveness. Since land and labor costs in Taiwan are high, some farmers have chosen to relocate overseas. In the midst of the recent wave of China-bound investment, there are even examples of people with official status taking seed technology across the Taiwan Strait as part of their investment.
This outflow of seeds and technology may damage Taiwan in two ways. First, it may lead to China competing with Taiwan for export markets, and second, Chinese products could be imported and sold on Taiwan's domestic market. To resolve these issues, the government passed the Plant Variety and Plant Seed Act (植物品種及種苗法) in 2004, effectively remedying these problems through intellectual property protection. However, the law has limitations, as it does not allow the application for patent rights on old plant varieties that previously could not be protected.
Even if we implement the most stringent legal requirements, today's technological advancements means that it would be difficult to stop anyone who wants to illegally take seeds out of the country. This means that for advanced nations that follow the rule of law, the key issue is not seed theft, but rather the ability to continue to further develop plant varieties and the related technology and provide protection of these intellectual property rights. The greatest threat to the nation's agricultural sector is the growing crisis in our deteriorating traditional plant breeding skills.
Apart from orchid breeding technology, most plant breeders work in official institutions and primarily in agencies experimenting with the improvement of agricultural products. Most have worked quietly and hard to make a contribution to Taiwan's agricultural miracle without seeking fame. With the rapid progress of gene technology, policies tend to emphasize cutting-edge technology without being able to also maintain traditional agricultural research skills.
This has resulted in a loss of talent and an inability to attract new blood. This means that the ability of existing plant breeders to create new strains is weakened because of extra additional workloads such as providing assistance and information to farmers. If this situation persists for long and the introduction of new and better strains slows, the consequence would be to damage the agricultural sector even more than the current problem of seed outflows.
In addition to the issue of seed outflows, technology outflow is also a concern. The government has an obligation to place appropriate restrictions on civil servants, rather than standing idly by. Agricultural academic groups should take a square look at members providing China with technical assistance, provide solutions for discussion and clarify the issues concerning the relationship between cross-strait academic exchanges and technology transfers to China.
Warren Kuo is a professor in the Department of Agronomy at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Eddy Chang and Lin Ya-ti
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS