The long-awaited first televised debate between three of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential aspirants came to a successful close last Sunday. The debate could be seen as a milestone in breaking the chain of traditional court politics and political trickery that have been rife in the Chinese-speaking world. In one stroke it elevated the DPP to the status of a truly healthy and steadily improving democratic political party.
From the format to the content, the debate could compete with those held in other first-rate democratic countries.
When the three DPP presidential hopefuls -- Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌), former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) and party Chairman Yu Shyi-kun -- shook hands, greeted each other and stood on the stage at their respective podiums, they created some semblance of a US presidential debate.
What is even more commendable is that almost all of the questions from the moderators were good and incisive ones, and each presidential hopeful was compelled to explain his political views. There were four moderators in this debate, which was more comprehensive and fair than in US presidential debates, which usually have only one moderator from the media.
The three presidential candidates engaged in gentlemanly competition throughout the debate. In addition, President Chen Shui-bian (
All in all, this was a successful debate, about which the DPP and the nation should be proud.
Political commentators as well as pan-green and pan-blue media outlets generally agreed on the candidates' approach: Su concentrated on looking back at what Taiwan and the DPP had achieved over the past few years, while Hsieh primarily talked about Taiwan's current status and the restrictions imposed on the nation, as well as how his political policies were best suited to the conditions. Yu presented his vision for the future, pledging to reform the nation's political system and setting a goal of improving on the current administration.
With regard to a new constitution and changing Taiwan's official name, issues of great importance to the pan-green camp, the three candidates agreed that Taiwan should seek to become a "normal" country. But while Su and Hsieh said that they would wait until Taiwanese society reaches a consensus, at which point Taiwan will naturally become a normal country, Yu favored a more proactive approach, saying he would do his best to promote the normalization of Taiwan, no matter what.
In terms of polemics, Su and Hsieh treated the DPP's presidential primary like a presidential election, emphasizing how different they are from former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
The debate was not only a very good opportunity for the candidates to demonstrate their political views to pan-green supporters, but also a big step toward ensuring that public opinion determines the final presidential candidate.
Most importantly, it also proved that no DPP faction or legislator can prevent public opinion from becoming the most potent force for the support that the DPP's presidential candidate will enjoy.
Cao Changqing is a Chinese writer based in the US.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS