Campaigns are about sending the right messages to the voters. Campaigns are about who can deliver their message well. A campaign cannot be successful if it is based solely on a negative message. All candidates should keep these rules in mind.
Regretfully, what we have witnessed in the last couple of weeks of the Democratic Progressive Party's primary battle is finger-pointing, exchanges of rhetoric and a lack of vision.
Since President Chen Shui-bian's (
Recent episodes include Lu's accusations about Su's attempts to force Chen out of office last year.
Lu implied in a TV interview that Su attempted to use his resignation as a threat to force Chen to step down when Chen was the target of a street campaign demanding his resignation. Yu later echoed Lu's statement. Hsieh also complained about Su's monopolizing of executive resources for his personal campaign.
Though he has confirmed Su's offer to resign on four separate occasions, Chen has protested Su's innocence.
As Su is by far and away the most popular of the "big four," it's only natural for the other three to target him as their common enemy before the DPP's primary process begins.
The media love the smell of blood and each competitor will take advantage of the other's mistakes to try and improve their chances. Negative campaigns have their place, but they do not form the essential structure of a winning campaign. They are sometimes used as tactical tools to gain an advantage, but most of the time negatives will only work once you've laid out an alternative vision for your candidacy through positive ads and reform-minded determination.
Therefore, we urge Chen, Hsieh and Su and all the DPP's candidates to focus primarily on offering positive and concrete public policy proposals and visions that will tackle Taiwan's pressing economic, social, environmental and cultural problems. Those are the messages that the voters want to hear.
Campaigns start with competing messages. The key to winning any race is to come up with an affirmative message that betters your opponents' message. It is the inability to understand this simple, straightforward point that causes more losses in politics than any other single factor.
In articulating the affirmative message of a campaign, comparisons between each candidates' positions may be needed. If the comparisons are just a thin disguise for negatives, voters will catch on quickly. If the comparisons of the positions are accurate and reflect the real opinions of the candidates, they may work.
Each contender has his or her own unique personality. The key is to translate this into leadership and turn the country back on the right track.
All four candidates should also seize the opportunity given by the public debates to convince the voters that the pursuit of social justice, independent national sovereignty, the enhancement of national security and clean politics constitute the keys to Taiwan's sustainable development.
Bold initiatives that leave the voters behind are not acts of leadership but of self-indulgent arrogance. The art of leadership is to maintain sufficient momentum to control events and steer public policy without losing support.
An idealist leader will not hesitate to do something that is unpopular. But a smart idealist will carefully measure public opinion before he does so.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS