The Kaohsiung City Government recently worked through the night under the protection of barbed-wire barriers and hundreds of police officers to dismantle a statue of late dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and remove his name from its cultural center. The media, meanwhile, broadcast images of the physical clashes between police officers and protesters, but failed to provide any analysis of the event.
When a similar controversy arose as police dispersed demonstrators protesting the closing of the Lo Sheng (Happy Life) Sanatorium in Taipei County, the media provided similarly biased and sensationalized reporting of the incident.
Whether controversy leads a society to progress or regress is contingent on how it is resolved -- by democratic means and appropriate procedures -- or counterproductive ones.
One of the principal functions of the news media should be to provide a platform for rational and fair discussion of such incidents. By their very nature, societies encounter conflicts, and Taiwan is no exception. It is therefore important that the media rise to the challenge and provide the necessary channels for discussion. This could help the public find common ground and prevent future problems, both of which are helpful in settling controversy and reaching a resolution that society as a whole finds acceptable.
Taiwan Public Television, for example, should be commended for its coverage of the sanatorium incident by choosing to run programs promoting public dialogue.
Unfortunately, the media have a tendency to do the opposite.
When reporting on the removal of Chiang statues or the sanatorium, to use two recent examples, the media sacrificed their role as a public instrument by focusing only on scenes of conflict. The incidents themselves should only be the tip of the iceberg in reporting. Every day, many things happen in the nation, but because they aren't related to elections, unification, independence, the media choose to ignore them.
For example, during the critical period when the fate of the aforementioned sanatorium was still being decided, political TV programs should have invited patients and organizations opposed to the closing, as well as heads of relevant central and local government agencies, to participate in a public discussion on the program. But this didn't happen.
To remedy this, some corrective measures are in order:
As the National Communications Commission (NCC) is charged with overseeing commercial broadcast media, it should ensure that broadcast media and political talk shows offer balanced coverage of major community and public issues.
In some countries, TV stations must report to supervisory government organizations every three months on their handling of important news in order to have their licenses renewed. Sadly, the situation here is different, hence the failure by all the 24-hour news channels to provide constructive debate on issues that matter.
The NCC should fully implement the Broadcasting and Television Law (
Police officers responded violently to the group of reporters covering the removal of protesters in front of the sanatorium on March 11. Such violence is uncalled for and the mainstream media should jointly condemn the police's action.
This incident clearly demonstrates that the Assembly and Parade Law (
Lo Shih-hung is the founder of the Campaign for Media Reform. Chad Liu is an assistant professor in the department of communications at National Chung Cheng University.
Translated by Marc Langer
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS