An article entitled Sovereignty is the basis of economy written by The Taiwan Association of University Vice Chairmen Michael Tai (戴正德) was published in the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times' sister newspaper) on March 10. In it, Tai says that if the Taiwanese people place economic development before national sovereignty and independence, Taiwan's economy will lack foundation. He also reminds us that economic development requires national sovereignty and independence.
Unfortunately, the private-sector negotiations with China concerning weekend cross-strait charter flights, Chinese yuan exchanges and allowing Chinese tourists to visit Taiwan are actually detrimental to Taiwan.
To meet the requests of Taiwanese businesspeople investing in China and the domestic tourism industry, the government is equating "guaranteeing" sovereignty with "delaying" sovereignty and deceiving the public by entrusting the private sector with the negotiations. It is thus selling out the sovereignty of Taiwan while being trapped by Beijing's talk of Taiwan being a domestic Chinese matter.
Hopefully, the government will consider Taiwan and understand the profound meaning of Tai's words before it is too late.
The weekend flights and the currency exchange plan can hardly be seen as part of economic development. Although such flights will save time for businesspeople in Taiwan, it will also increase investment and tourism expenditure for businesspeople and the public.
According to a survey by the Chinese National Federation of Industries, opening cross-strait links will lead to an annual increase in Chinese-bound investment of almost NT$300 billion (US$9 billion). While a survey conducted by the Mainland Affairs Council shows that Taiwanese tourists traveling to China would increase by about 1.6 times, with an increase in expenditure of NT$70 billion, while spending by Chinese tourists in Taiwan is estimated to reach NT$25 billion.
A quick calculation suggests that Taiwan will suffer a net outflow of at least NT$345 billion per year if the plans are approved.
In addition to paying attention to the principle that economic development requires national sovereignty and independence, it is necessary to gain an in-depth understanding of the significance of economic autonomy and development when pursuing sovereignty and independence.
When Taiwan's capital and resources gradually shrink because of the opening of cross-strait links and deregulating banking investments in China, China's attraction will become stronger. By that time, any measure aimed at improving the domestic investment environment will be ineffective. Officially allowing trade in the Chinese yuan will cause it to gradually replace the New Taiwan Dollar and unhindered cross-strait trade will give it the status of a semi-national currency.
The "Three Yesses" -- yes to the pursuit of independence, name change and a new constitution -- will become an empty slogan. Economy feeds sovereignty, and when sovereignty no longer gets the nutrition it needs, it will wither and die.
Taiwan's economic foundation remains good. As long as the government protects our sovereignty and does not lift the bans on cross-strait links, China-bound investments by local banks and high-tech industry, the investment ceiling and circulation of the yuan which represents Chinese sovereignty before Beijing recognizes Taiwan's sovereignty, the fourth "Yes" -- the pursuit of economic development -- will follow automatically. This in time will lead to a change in the national title, a new constitution and normalization of Taiwan's national status.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS