The build-up to the elections in Taiwan and the US has started much earlier than in past elections. The changes that these elections will likely bring, in addition to what is already taking place in China and the Middle East, could have an important impact on relationships in the region.
Both Taiwan and the US will hold legislative and presidential elections. Some of the prevailing policies -- including commitments made by the last two administrations -- are not likely to be retained, at least not in their present form, by whoever wins the presidential election in Taiwan.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has made the economy its primary platform, which also makes its relationship with China a central issue.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), for its part, emphasizes Taiwanese identity and makes the US its most important partner.
The two main parties will have different ideas on to cultivate the relationship with the US. At the same time, the parties are looking in two different directions on where they want Taiwan to go.
Though the US may not want to interfere with Taiwan's internal matters -- especially democratic elections -- the outcome of those elections will be important for Washington.
In addition, both political parties have more than one potential candidate for president, some of whom -- former Taipei mayor and KMT chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and President Chen Shui-bian's (
The legislative elections on Dec. 8 will determine the make-up of a legislature that is completely different from the present one -- half the current size and involving different districts. The two main parties will likely dominate, but other parties could still make some gains.
The KMT and DPP platforms are markedly different. One seeks unification with China, while the other envisions a separate country. Various efforts are being made to bring about constitutional changes on domestic matters and issues of sovereignty.
Even though a law was passed in Taiwan that was tried out , very carefully, in the last 2004 elections, some individuals in the pan-blue camp, not to mention Beijing, refuse to accept the legality of referendums.
The recent renaming of certain government institutions, with more to come, has engendered some opposition. The Taiwan Solidarity Union has often worked with the DPP on some issues, but there are now differences that likely will change the relationship.
And although James Soong's (宋楚瑜) People First Party has teamed up with the KMT for the forthcoming elections, it remains unclear how this relationship will work out.
As for the US, relations with China continue to grow and despite hedging on some issues, meetings in Beijing and Washington are becoming more frequent. Chinese officials often raise the issue of Taiwan, to which the US will likely continue to repeat its "status quo" policy without really addressing the problem.
This is part of the US's commitment in the "six assurances," -- that is, that it will not play a mediation role between Taipei and Beijing. Chinese diplomats will continue to exploit this to ensure that Washington pressures Taipei to refrain from acting unilaterally on sovereignty issues.
These issues are usually handled by the representatives in Washington and Taipei. If there are differences that require higher-level attention, one side or the other sends a special representative to discuss the matter. Given the differences within both governments on some issues, that process is not as effective as an ongoing dialogue system.
The elections of Congress and a new president in the US will come only a few months after those in Taiwan. Any change in the relationship between Washington and Taipei will be determined in the early days of the new Taiwanese government and in the midst of US elections -- not necessarily the best time for diplomatic change.
Early next year, Taiwan will have a new government. The US, however, will be dispatching personnel and developing its policies only in early 2009. An ongoing dialogue system could help smooth out political differences while each side is making its policies.
Nat Bellocchi is a former chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan and is now a special adviser to the Liberty Times Group. The views expressed in this article are his own.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS