With just a year left until he leaves office, President Chen Shui-bian (
Wu's predecessors, Chen Chien-jen (
Since he became president, Chen has sent a number of DPP members to learn the diplomatic ropes as deputy representatives to the US, but has demonstrated his respect for the professionalism required by the job by retaining more qualified Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) members in the top post. However, to train its own members in diplomacy and North American affairs, the DPP has finally sent one of its own. If it hadn't, it would have squandered an opportunity to make its mark on US-Taiwan relations.
When problems arose between Taiwan and the US, there was some mutual distrust between Taipei and the representative office in Washington due to differing political backgrounds. Both Taipei and Washington wondered if their messages were getting through, or whether they were being distorted through the prism of domestic politics. As a result, the Presidential Office often bypassed regular diplomatic channels to contact the Bush administration, leaving the official representative office in charge of administrative affairs only. But as Wu has Chen's trust, he should be able to put an end to the confusion and redundancies.
Although Taiwan-US relations are fundamentally diplomatic affairs, Washington has always been a main battleground during exchanges between China and Taiwan. Since Beijing began enlisting the US' help in restraining Taiwan from changing the "status quo," Washington has become the most direct and effective shortcut for each to exert pressure on the other.
This has been especially true since former US deputy secretary of state Robert Zoellick began encouraging China to become a "responsible stakeholder." For example, during a visit to the US in 2005, Chinese President Hu Jintao (
Chen's appointment of a seasoned veteran in cross-strait affairs to represent Taiwan in Washington clearly demonstrates his view that cross-strait relations are an extension of Taiwan-US relations. In doing so, he has established a strategic triangle between the three countries.
Wu's appointment as Taiwan's most crucial diplomatic officer will be a heavy responsibility and test of his ability. As the first DPP representative to the US and one of Chen's most trusted allies, he will not only be the nation's envoy in Washington, but also a channel of communication and the architect of mutual trust between Taiwan and the US. He will also need to use the US' political leverage to maintain balance among the three players in the Taiwan Strait.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS