As next year's presidential election approaches, the nation's two biggest political parties are faced with the difficult task of having to select tickets that would give them the greatest chance of winning the presidency.
The importance of the upcoming presidential election for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is without question.
For the DPP, winning this election will help salvage the party from the past year's slump, during which its top figures, including President Chen Shui-bian (
As for the KMT, after losing the previous two presidential elections, it cannot wait to reclaim the presidency and enjoy the sweet taste of political victory.
Both parties have mechanisms for the primaries through which -- in theory at least -- the best candidates will be elected through a combination of ballots cast by party members and public opinion polls. While this process seems straightforward and in conformity with the fundamentals of democracy, it has some fatal flaws.
This explains why, before the primaries have even been held, both parties have decided to resort to negotiations among the contenders to decide who should be nominated. The biggest flaw in that approach is that the attendant party infighting could split them.
When it comes to the consequences of such splits, the KMT probably has the most painful experience -- notably the 2000 presidential election. The KMT's votes were divided between the party's nominated candidate -- Lien Chan (
Life, however, has its many ironies. In light of the standoff between former KMT chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Although Wang has more seniority than Ma in the party, Ma's popularity made it almost certain that he would be chosen to represent the party. However, the scales began to tip in Wang's favor after Ma was formally indicted on embezzlement charges.
While Ma's popularity remains high, it is not unlikely that he will be convicted on those charges, which could have serious repercussions for the KMT's image. Hence Wang's determination to run as presidential candidate and nothing else.
Under such extraordinary circumstances, Lien and Wu Po-hsiung (
Given his political stature, it is highly unlikely Lien would settle for anything less than the presidency. However, Ma's unwillingness to be Wang's sidekick probably also applies to Lien.
It seems that in the weeks ahead the KMT will need to accomplish no less than squaring the circle.
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS