Anyone aspiring to become president of this nation, should take stock of mainstream public opinion. This is an obvious step that any would-be president should take before they start trumpeting themselves as the best qualified person for the job.
Bearing this in mind, the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) four presidential aspirants should take the results of a newly-released survey from the Taiwan Thinktank to heart. The Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) presidential frontrunner, former chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Based on the answers of 1,064 respondents, the survey showed that 79.5 percent believed that only Taiwanese are entitled to make a decision on the nation's future, while 14.5 percent said the decision should be made jointly by the people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
The survey, released on Tuesday, also showed that 81.9 percent of respondents believed that China has no right to interfere in Taiwan's internal affairs, including the government's ongoing name-change campaign and drive for constitutional reform, while 12.8 percent said China has the right to do so.
For the four DPP presidential contenders vying for the party's nomination, the survey serves as a reminder that they need to stay in line with the party's founding principles and ideals.
For Ma, who has time and again stated unification with China as his eventual goal for the nation, the results should be a wake-up call and seem to suggest he needs to reassess his platform and his "Greater China" mindset if he hopes to succeed in becoming president.
That a Taiwanese identity has been steadily building over the past years is an undeniable fact.
A survey by the Election Study Center at National Chengchi University last December showed that the percentage of respondents who consider themselves "Taiwanese" had increased from 56 percent in 2005 to 60 percent last year.
A more recent poll on the matter conducted by the DPP and released on Tuesday showed that 68 percent of respondents identified themselves as Taiwanese, 16.8 percent identified themselves as Chinese, while 11.7 percent said they were both Taiwanese and Chinese.
All poll results must be taken with a pinch of salt and the accuracy of such polls is a contentious issue. Nonetheless, the various polls all suggest a similar trend: Taiwan consciousness is on the rise and that the ratio of those who believe Taiwan should move toward independence has also steadily increased.
How can Ma -- or whoever the DPP representative turns out to be -- expect to win the support of the electorate if they fail to put their faith in a Taiwan consciousness and reflect what is obviously becoming the mainstream opinion?
How does any presidential hopeful expect to score a victory in next year's presidential election if they stand diametrically opposed to what the vast majority of people believe in?
As academic and pioneer in the contemporary field of leadership studies Warren Bennis once said:"Good leaders make people feel that they're at the very heart of things, not at the periphery."
All those who aspire to run for the country's top job should ensure that the Taiwanese are not relegated to that periphery.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS