The preparations for next year's presidential election have entered the nomination stage. The Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) internal mechanism and the competition between its various candidates seem to be running smoother than that of other parties. If the nomination process is mishandled, however, it could result in infighting, which would be very bad for the party.
This is why the big parties with established mechanisms follow these mechanisms -- unless there is sufficient reason for altering them.
To allow the indicted former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
This gives the public a clear insight into the party. That the KMT, which boasts of having a wealth of talented people, seems to think that life without Ma is impossible, is risible.
The DPP's big four -- Vice President Annette Lu (
There is only one president and one vice president and not two of each. This explains why it is so important for the DPP to act as one. Even if the four split into two tickets for the primaries, they must perform as one united ruling team when in government.
While the contenders vie for publicity during the nomination process, they should do so with respect for their competitors. That is, they should focus on presenting their arguments in a positive manner rather than denigrating their opponents as a way to demonstrate that there is no bad blood between them and that they will continue to work together in future.
But more importantly, the president has to assume more responsibility and therefore the candidates running for the DPP's presidential nomination should be held to even higher standards.
Democratization and localization processes feed upon one another, but for historical reasons, the nation's sovereignty is still incomplete. The first thing that the next president should do, therefore, is uphold and promote Taiwanese consciousness.
When former president Lee Teng-hui (
A few years ago President Chen Shui-bian (
The next president should also present his or her specific goals.
Following the DPP's ascension to power in 2000, the pan-blue camp has adopted a scorched earth policy toward its opponent. Last year, former DPP chairman Shih Ming-teh (施明德) even organized a campaign aimed at ousting Chen from office.
On the international scene, China has worked so hard to isolate Taiwan that even Washington, wary of offending Beijing, has been critical of Taipei. The nation's future president must be able to resist pressure and persevere. Although the strategies adopted may be flexible, the president's reform goals must be crystal-clear and adherence to the sovereignty principle should be unwavering.
Because of the nation's national identity crisis, internal problems and ethnic differences, party and national unity will be difficult to achieve. The future president will therefore need to be receptive to and tolerant of differing opinions
Paul Lin is a political commentator in Taipei.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS