Taiwan is one of the wealthiest countries in the world, technologically advanced, with a relatively stable democratic system of government and a well-educated, peaceful society. Its products are sold in every corner of the world, and it fields world-class talent in almost every realm of human endeavor, from film-making to biomedical research.
But if you have never been to Taiwan, you may not recognize it as the country just described.
This is because Taiwan is largely treated -- if not viewed -- as a backwater by most major international media outlets. People outside of Taiwan only hear of the place watching videos of brawling legislators on "funniest video" shows, or in the context of "Taiwan angered China today by blah blah blah..."
The CIA's World Factbook places Taiwan in the top tenth-percentile of the world's economies by size. It also has a population that places it in the top fifth-percentile of the world's countries.
Many major print and broadcast media outlets maintain only a token presence in Taiwan, and in recent years many publications and news services have even scaled back, preferring instead to cover Taiwan from Hong Kong or even Beijing.
The Asian Wall Street Journal, for example, moved its correspondent out of Taiwan years ago, and now covers Taiwan from China.
CNN does not even bother with that, simply buying video footage from a local cable news station, and then doing studio voice-overs from Hong Kong. Meanwhile, it maintains full bureaus in countries with comparable (or even smaller) economies and populations, such as Belgium or Thailand.
If one looks at the major international news wires on even the busiest news day in Taiwan, there will still be two to three times as many stories about Thailand or the Philippines as about this country.
So why does Taiwan figure so prominently in its obscurity?
An obvious reason is that years of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) propaganda, coupled with international diplomacy by Beijing, make Taiwan synonymous with China the world over.
Even people who are sympathetic to Taiwan because of the liberties and wealth its people enjoy still believe the rubric that "Taiwan is a breakaway province" -- a cheeky, democratic David that dares to tell the evil authoritarian Goliath of China to shove off.
So why not cover Taiwan from China? What's the difference?
This assumption of synonymity frames Taiwan's de facto independence as an aberration, a freak of history -- and what's more, a freak of "Chinese" history. This is why even respected academics and writers regularly refer to Taiwan as the world's first "Chinese democracy" or the "best hope for democratizing the mainland."
None of this is to deny the profound impact of Taiwan's historical interactions with China, which have obviously shaped this society in fundamental ways. But even a superficial knowledge of Taiwan's history shows that the story of this country is much more complicated than a mere "renegade province."
Equating Taiwan with China is no different than equating the Palestinian territories to Israel or Ireland to the UK. It ignores basic realities -- not of principle or of ideology, but of real, on-the-ground, who-stamps-your-passport realities.
The government -- whether it is KMT or Democratic Progressive Party -- cannot change these perceptions overnight. But Taiwan needs to at least make the effort, and that effort begins by engaging foreign media outlets and journalists.
The place to start is reducing the amount of red tape journalists must work through to get access to officials -- think abolishing the useless Government Information Office -- and by increasing the amount of information that is available in English.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS