Taiwan is one of the wealthiest countries in the world, technologically advanced, with a relatively stable democratic system of government and a well-educated, peaceful society. Its products are sold in every corner of the world, and it fields world-class talent in almost every realm of human endeavor, from film-making to biomedical research.
But if you have never been to Taiwan, you may not recognize it as the country just described.
This is because Taiwan is largely treated -- if not viewed -- as a backwater by most major international media outlets. People outside of Taiwan only hear of the place watching videos of brawling legislators on "funniest video" shows, or in the context of "Taiwan angered China today by blah blah blah..."
The CIA's World Factbook places Taiwan in the top tenth-percentile of the world's economies by size. It also has a population that places it in the top fifth-percentile of the world's countries.
Many major print and broadcast media outlets maintain only a token presence in Taiwan, and in recent years many publications and news services have even scaled back, preferring instead to cover Taiwan from Hong Kong or even Beijing.
The Asian Wall Street Journal, for example, moved its correspondent out of Taiwan years ago, and now covers Taiwan from China.
CNN does not even bother with that, simply buying video footage from a local cable news station, and then doing studio voice-overs from Hong Kong. Meanwhile, it maintains full bureaus in countries with comparable (or even smaller) economies and populations, such as Belgium or Thailand.
If one looks at the major international news wires on even the busiest news day in Taiwan, there will still be two to three times as many stories about Thailand or the Philippines as about this country.
So why does Taiwan figure so prominently in its obscurity?
An obvious reason is that years of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) propaganda, coupled with international diplomacy by Beijing, make Taiwan synonymous with China the world over.
Even people who are sympathetic to Taiwan because of the liberties and wealth its people enjoy still believe the rubric that "Taiwan is a breakaway province" -- a cheeky, democratic David that dares to tell the evil authoritarian Goliath of China to shove off.
So why not cover Taiwan from China? What's the difference?
This assumption of synonymity frames Taiwan's de facto independence as an aberration, a freak of history -- and what's more, a freak of "Chinese" history. This is why even respected academics and writers regularly refer to Taiwan as the world's first "Chinese democracy" or the "best hope for democratizing the mainland."
None of this is to deny the profound impact of Taiwan's historical interactions with China, which have obviously shaped this society in fundamental ways. But even a superficial knowledge of Taiwan's history shows that the story of this country is much more complicated than a mere "renegade province."
Equating Taiwan with China is no different than equating the Palestinian territories to Israel or Ireland to the UK. It ignores basic realities -- not of principle or of ideology, but of real, on-the-ground, who-stamps-your-passport realities.
The government -- whether it is KMT or Democratic Progressive Party -- cannot change these perceptions overnight. But Taiwan needs to at least make the effort, and that effort begins by engaging foreign media outlets and journalists.
The place to start is reducing the amount of red tape journalists must work through to get access to officials -- think abolishing the useless Government Information Office -- and by increasing the amount of information that is available in English.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS