Two important ideas are often lost in all the cross-strait controversy. What Westerners miss is the flimsiness of China's claim over Taiwan. What Taiwanese folks miss is the degree to which that Western ignorance affects their status in the world.
Although academics and pundits have publicly stated the facts about Taiwan's history and status, most Westerners are still not aware of these things.
The Taiwan issue is just one among thousands that vie for precious air time on the nightly news, and more often than not, the local weather and sports scores occupy most Westerners' minds much more than Taiwan's distant needs.
Academics and pundits aren't newsmakers. So in order to grab the world's attention and get the message out, a real newsmaker needs to step up.
President Chen Shui-bian (
"Because of several decades of brainwashing in the KMT-controlled school system, sadly even many of my countrymen do not know the full story I'm about to tell. Naturally, even fewer in the West have heard this story. It is the story of Taiwan's history, and it bears heavily on the validity of China's supposed claim to this territory, the so-called `one China' principle.
"If there is anything the Chinese love to talk about more than the `one China' principle, it is the `5,000 Years of History' of which they are rightly so proud. And since the main island of Taiwan is so close to China on the map, it's hardly surprising that so many Westerners would assume Taiwan has been a part of China, inhabited by Chinese people, right from the start. But that is not the case."
(To save space, I'll skip the history lesson that would be the bulk of A-bian's statement. The reader may refer to Bruce Jacobs' excellent article last week ["Describing Taiwan's real history," Feb. 9, page 8] or the Taiwan History page on www.wikipedia.org. It will suffice here to note simply that there were few Chinese inhabitants on Taiwan until the 1600s, when the Dutch began importing them as laborers. Traditionally, Chinese rulers deemed Taiwan a "useless ball of mud." And even for the 212 years (1683 to 1895) when China did nominally claim this territory, it was seen as much more of a nuisance than an asset. The "one China" principle is nothing but an artifact of Cold-War propaganda and of dictator Chiang Kai-shek's (
Continuing now with my speculative A-bian statement: "China makes much of its `century of shame' at the hands of Western colonial powers in the 1800s, and claims Taiwan is the last piece of territory yet to be repatriated from that period -- following the handover of Hong Kong and Macau in the 1990s. But what of Taiwan's `century of shame' at the hands of colonizers from Japan and China in the 1900s? Do not the Taiwanese people also deserve a chance to reclaim their dignity and sovereignty?
"As a member of the UN, China purports to uphold the ideals of the UN charter, Article I of which declares `respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples.' But the `one China' policy is clearly incompatible with this principle.
"If China wants to join the ranks of mature, stable world powers, it ought to be "big enough" to admit that it already has plenty of territory, and acknowledge the Taiwanese people's right to choose their own destiny -- just as the US has allowed the people of Puerto Rico to hold several plebescites on their sovereign status over the years.
"When you study the history, this notion that Taiwan is an `inalienable' part of China starts to look pretty weak. But hey, don't take my word for it. (After all, I'm the president of Taiwan, and my views might be biased.) Look it up for yourself. Go down to the library or get on the Internet, and see what you can learn about our history. Then decide for yourself whether or not China has any legitimate claim to our country."
One of the main reasons why China has been so successful with its campaign to isolate Taiwan diplomatically is because most people in the world still think Taiwan has been "Chinese" since ancient times. Just look at how every article or story about Taiwan contains a line or two explaining that "Taiwan split from the mainland in 1949" to see how deeply entrenched this notion has become.
But if that notion were to be challenged and shaken -- perhaps by a headline-making statement like this from A-bian -- China's claim over Taiwan might soon be recognized for the petulant, narcissistic whining it truly is. Instead of gaining sympathy from a guilt-ridden West over the wrongs suffered by China in the past, the "one China" policy could quickly become a face-losing proposition for the Chinese.
The court of world opinion is currently in recess on the question of Taiwan. But it won't be long before a verdict is called for. In the meantime, Taiwan's government and its people should be doing everything in their power to sway the prevailing mood in their direction. China certainly is, and has been for years.
John Diedrichs is a writer based in Taipei.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS