Yesterday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma announced his resignation as he promised he would if indicted, but he also announced his presidential candidacy.
Seeing its hopes of returning to power next year diminishing, the pan-blue camp is panicking. Followers of Ma and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
Some KMT members argue that the nation should not be deprived of a presidential candidate solely because of some "absurd" indictment. They have abolished the party's black-gold clause, which calls for the suspension of party membership in the case of an indictment -- a regulation that was introduced by Ma -- and originally hoped to relieve Ma of his pledge to resign as chairman if indicted.
Others are hoping Ma will decide to run as a pan-blue independent. Still others say that he should continue with a KMT presidential bid regardless of the consequences.
All of these groups are actually helping to damage Ma's political credibility.
With party regulations changing so that Ma can become the KMT's presidential candidate, voters will question his integrity.
If Ma persists in his quest for the presidency, it will be difficult for him to claim to be different from President Chen Shui-bian (
When the first family tries to delay the legal progress of first lady Wu Shu-jen's (
On the other hand, running as an independent candidate and waging war on former party comrades would generate the ugliest pan-blue split vote ever seen. Wang's supporters say that any attempt to amend the party charter to benefit Ma will have consequences. It will be intriguing to see what consequences these are.
The campaign to depose Chen called for integrity, but now the pan-blue camp does not want to abide by these principles. If Ma proceeds with this course of action, it will not only mar his reputation, but also make it impossible for the KMT to talk about rules of any nature with credibility.
A Harvard doctor of law and a former justice minister should not take this approach. He cannot justify his preferential treatment to those who have been disciplined in accordance with the party charter in the past.
On the same day, Ma has been indicted for corruption and has shown disregard for the spirit of law by challenging the KMT to endorse him.
The pan-blue camp may be willing to turn a blind eye to Ma's indictment, but the public may not be as charitable.
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS