Presidential Office Secretary-General Chiou I-jen (
To create the required conditions for such a solution, we should build a consensus on national identity, while on the other hand breaking free from the international community's unfair and absurd stance. If we can reach a certain level of consensus on the national identity issue, the international community's absurdity would be further highlighted, which might make it easier to create a breakthrough.
In the past, the dispute over Taiwan's national identity has been stuck in the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) independence-unification trap. This trap is built on a faulty premise: Taiwan is part of China. It is this erroneous premise that creates the issue of Taiwan's independence from or unification with China.
If we want to build consensus on the national identity issue, this faulty premise must be replaced with two questions.
The first question to ask is whether or not Taiwan is a part of China, or the People's Republic of China (PRC). In the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty, which officially ended World War II, Japan only renounced its sovereignty over Taiwan, but it was not specified who that sovereignty should pass to -- China or the ROC. Given this fact, the Taiwanese people should at least be able to reach a minimal consensus: based on both legal principles and reality, neither China nor the ROC has sovereignty over Taiwan.
The second question to be asked is whether Taiwan is an independent nation. If Taiwan's political parties and politicians do not recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state, then how are they qualified to run for president or vice president?
If we can agree that Taiwan is a sovereign state and not part of China, then the issue of the nation's title becomes a bit more flexible. The campaign to correct Taiwan's national title may still be an emotional issue, but more important is the fact that China insists that the ROC has been succeeded by the PRC; as a result the ROC does not exist and is not recognized in the international community.
Whether based on legal principles or reality, the PRC has no sovereignty over Taiwan. What the PRC does have is the power to isolate Taiwan internationally in its deceitful attempts to "inherit" sovereignty over Taiwan.
The US, which directed the signing of the San Francisco Peace Treaty with Japan, knows very well that China has no legal claim over Taiwan but still gives in to China's blackmail. It also disregards democratic principles and demands that Taiwan not change its national title, thus placing Taiwan in an impossible situation.
Taiwan's current status is that of a sovereign and independent nation and the international community is to blame for not recognizing this fact. On the international front, Taiwan must highlight the international community's mistaken, contradictory and absurd stance.
If the US believes that maintaining the cross-strait status quo is conducive to stability, then it should recognize Taiwan's current national title. If it doesn't, Taiwan will have no choice but to create a new constitution and correct the national title in order to be able to break from the isolation created by the "two noes" and avoid being annexed by China.
Shen Chieh is a journalist based in the US. Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS