The saga of "209," a stray dog that lived for nearly two years on a 30cm-wide divider between the north and southbound lanes on the Sun Yat-sen Freeway near Changhua, was brought to an end on Sunday when several volunteers from an animal welfare group took it upon themselves to mount a rescue operation and capture the dog.
It took the nine volunteers five hours of chasing the poor animal and three attempts to sedate it before they could finally remove the dog. But while the intentions of the animal welfare group were entirely honorable, their highly irresponsible modus operandi left a lot to be desired and raises a number of important issues.
First, the group failed to contact the highway authorities to ask for permission prior to attempting their daring rescue, which involved crossing the busy freeway on foot. The freeways are hazardous enough without a group of unauthorized people putting both their own lives and those of motorists at risk by running around after a stray dog. One can only imagine the traffic chaos that ensued during the rescue operation.
Thankfully the volunteers' rescue effort did not lead to any accidents. But how could nine people spend such a long time running around on a freeway without the police intervening?
These people should at least have been detained, and even though police said they would be slapped with fines of between NT$3,000 and NT$6,000, that is hardly severe enough to deter this kind of reckless behavior. They could have ended up causing the deaths of several people, including their own.
The second issue that arises is the apathy of the nation's freeway police. Having been there for nearly two years and having gained minor celebrity status in the region, the dog was known to present a serious traffic hazard. It had reportedly often brought traffic to a screeching halt when it jumped down onto the freeway.
The authorities made 52 attempts to capture the stranded dog, including the laying of baited traps. But they couldn't have been trying very hard, and this says something about even the authorities' lackadaisical attitude to an issue as important as road safety.
Third is the pitiful existence of many of the nation's stray dogs, which has long been a contentious issue. The plight of strays and the inhumane treatment they receive from authorities in the past prompted the World Society for the Protection of Animals to declare Taiwan the worst place in the world for dogs.
And although there are many kind-hearted people and organizations that go out of their way to care for an estimated 2 million strays, the fate of these animals still presents a serious problem that needs to be tackled. The government needs to take the problem far more seriously and come up with an intelligent alternative to its preferred solution of extermination.
The authorities need to work with charitable foundations and come up with innovative ways to tackle the religious and social issues responsible for the high number of strays around the nation. Only by doing this can we ensure that the tale of "209" will not be repeated.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS