On Jan. 29, the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) ran an editorial discussing the impact of China's recent launch of its new satellite-destroying weapon on the overall US and Japanese regional strategy. Besides those issues, China's decision is going to have major repercussions for the Taiwanese space program.
By successfully reproducing the anti-satellite technology developed by the US and the Soviet Union in the 1980s, the Chinese military has caused Europe, the US and Japan to question the nature of its space development program.
It will also lead to international pressure resulting from the dangerous debris that will remain in orbit for at least two decades, which could damage other countries' satellites operating below an alrtitude of 860km. What the Chinese military actually wants to achieve is to counteract the strengthening US-Japan military alliance and fulfill its goal of annexing Taiwan by force.
Taiwan won international recognition by its successful deployment of the FORMOSAT-3 satellite last year. This satellite follows a low orbit at the same altitude as the one knocked down by China. China's threat to Taiwan's space assets is therefore abundantly clear.
Taiwan should actively pursue three projects to deal with the challenge from China's space program.
First, it should not rely on only one satellite to conduct its low-orbit remote reconnaissance. Since the National Space Organization (NSPO) already has a top-notch imaging planning and scheduling system, Taiwan needs only to form strategic partnerships with international imaging providers to ensure that its photographic reconnaissance needs are met.
If Taiwan can achieve this goal, the overall risk will be greatly reduced. More importantly, China would consequently pay a much higher price if it were to destroy Taiwan's capabilities to conduct remote reconnaissance in space.
Second, Taiwan should establish its own ability to develop remote reconnaissance satellites and the ability to send replacements into space if its current remote reconnaissance satellite is attacked or damaged.
To guarantee that satellites will be able to carry out their missions, it is important that operators on the ground be familiar with how to handle them during early orbit, the critical stage during which operators guide the satellite into orbit after it has detached from the launch vehicle.
A series of independently produced satellites could be the heritage of Taiwan's space program. They could also help ensure that operators have better control over their functions during early orbit operations as well as when updating them.
Third, researching and developing a launch vehicle could have strategic significance for the independence of Taiwan's space program. Having a launch vehicle is the basic prerequisite for major space powers to get practical experience in developing their own space technology. A launch vehicle would quickly accelerate Taiwan into an actual recognized presence in space and also enhance its independent satellite development.
Implementing this will require the formation of an agency to plan and execute it, but the more crucial factor will be having an adequate budget.
The planned budget for the NSPO was cut by one-fourth due to a boycott in the legislature. The delayed passage of the government's budget will have a substantial impact on research and development.
At such a critical stage, the legislature should give full support to investment in space and the space budget in order to safeguard Taiwan's space intelligence and protect national security.
Lance Wu is director general of the National Space Organization.
Translated by Daniel cheng and Marc Langer
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS