Recent years have seen important achievements for democracy in Asia, including the first direct presidential and legislative elections in Indonesia and commendable efforts toward constitutional reform in Taiwan.
Yet, according to Freedom in the World 2007, Freedom House's annual survey of global political rights and civil liberties, Asia suffered more setbacks last year than any other region, with one-third of Asia Pacific countries ranking as less free early this year than they were a year ago. Moreover, in nearly every case, the catalyst for decline has been precisely the same issue that has challenged each country historically -- and in many cases, since its very founding.
The year's setbacks have taken a more overt, even startling, form in some countries while a more gradual backsliding appears to be underway in others.
The late?September coup in Thailand clearly marked the region's most abrupt reversal. While the ousting of prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra removed an increasingly authoritarian leader with no significant violence or shortage of popular support, the coup has thrown Thailand -- born from a military coup in 1932 -- back to an era of military rule, an era it took the country its first six decades to overcome.
The fact that the military junta has established a civilian interim government (led by a former army commander) and shied away from Myanmar-esque repression is hardly reason for confidence in the country's trajectory. No date has been set for elections, the plan for drafting a new constitution is firmly controlled by the military's Council for National Security and judicial independence has been indefinitely erased with an appointed tribunal standing in the place of an abrogated Constitutional Court. Meanwhile, the recent bombings in Bangkok signal coming unrest and hopes for progress toward resolving the country's Muslim insurgency in the south fade with each day the fighting persists.
A failure to effectively address historically sensitive issues is simultaneously inhibiting reform elsewhere. Malaysia's recurrent challenges of race and religion returned to the fore following a series of court cases that have raised the concerns of non-Muslim minorities regarding their legal and religious rights. Rather than embrace productive debate about the same issues that divided the country in the 1960s, the Badawi government suppressed related civil society activism and press coverage and denied a call for the review of constitutionally guaranteed religious freedoms.
As the prime minister continued to advocate the concept of Islam Hadari -- an inclusive and progressive form of Islam at the center of his Ninth Malaysia Plan for economic development -- religious intolerance reached new heights with the rise of anti-apostasy movements and heated debate over the issue of religious conversion.
Indonesia revisited the same question that challenged president Sukarno in 1945 of whether to be an Islamic state. While promoting the national, pluralistic ideology of Pancasila Indonesia amid a spate of religiously motivated attacks and forced church closures, the government failed to revoke shariah by-laws in a number of districts that curb the rights of women and religious minorities.
In the Philippines, where leaders have been removed from office through popular overthrow just as many times as through elections, fears of a coup attempt led President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo to call a state of emergency that involved security raids on anti-government press offices, the unwarranted arrests of opposition officials and the brutal suppression of public protests.
East Timor's fledgling democracy was devastated by riots that necessitated the establishment of the fourth UN presence in the country's four-year history.
This trend of old problems re-emerging has by no means been limited to southeast Asia. Civil conflict reignited in Sri Lanka, while political violence and polarization escalated in Bangladesh. The military maintained a firm grip on power in Pakistan, as General Musharraf continued to use undemocratic means to foster his own support and cripple the opposition.
For all its vitality in the economic sphere, China has made disappointing progress toward the protection of political and civil rights. Alarmed by growing unrest among farmers and the working class, last year the government further restricted the media and cracked down on a new generation of human rights activists.
Indonesia has undoubtedly made great advances since the fall of Suharto, including most recently a successful peace and impressive elections in Aceh. The ceasefire and popular overthrow of an authoritarian monarch in Nepal marked another shining achievement. Moreover, in many of those countries where freedom does exist, it can be considered strong (Taiwan, Japan, South Korea and India).
However, the number of core Asian countries counted as "Free" grew by only one last year versus 1972, the first year of the Freedom in the World survey. Last year's developments reflect the extent to which many of the same issues that have repeatedly plagued these countries continue to inhibit fundamental freedoms of expression, association, media, gender equality and equality under the law.
While complex and enduring, none of these problems is irreparable. The fact that, in nearly every case, public discussion of these volatile issues has been extraordinarily vibrant may be the surest sign that recent setbacks can be reversed.
Camille Eiss is southeast Asia analyst for Freedom in the World, Freedom House's annual index of political rights and civil liberties.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS