The financial scandal involving Rebar Asia Pacific Group that erupted last week once again highlights the need for a cross-strait mechanism for extraditing criminals. In the absence of such measures, unscrupulous criminals will continue taking advantage of and profiting from the political impasse between Taiwan and China to avoid suffering the repercussions of their wrongdoings.
That criminals big and small have been seeking a haven across the Strait to avoid punishment is not a new phenomenon. In fact, this practice has become so commonplace that the only reason people like Wang You-theng (
In any other country, the authorities would request the extradition of criminals via formal channels and official agreements. Taiwan does not enjoy such recourse as it only has formal agreements with a handful of countries. This stems from the fact that most countries do not recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state -- including the country where most Taiwanese fugitives flee after committing a crime, China.
It is quite unlikely that a bilateral treaty on extradition with Beijing will be inked anytime soon. Taipei should nevertheless continue to insist on establishing a system, however informal, for the extradition of wanted individuals.
A precedent was set in the 1990s when -- with assistance from the Red Cross -- Taipei and Beijing reached an agreement on the return of illegal Chinese immigrants to China.
China's image abroad has been greatly damaged by the fact that it has become a haven of choice for criminals fleeing prosecution. Beijing's inaction on this issue is in stark contrast to other countries' assistance when Beijing seeks the extradition of corrupt Chinese officials.
Last year, Beijing signed a bilateral extradition treaty with Spain -- the first developed country to enter such a treaty with China. A similar agreement with France is expected soon. Reacting to a growing number of corrupt former Chinese officials fleeing to developed countries, Beijing has been stepping up its efforts to sign extradition treaties with many of them.
What makes matters worse for Taiwan is that many of the criminals who run off to China use their stolen money to finance projects there. Adding salt to the wound, every now and then some of these criminals are wined and dined by Chinese officials. Such scenes engender great resentment, especially on the part of hardworking Taiwanese who have lost life-long savings to these criminals.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS