President Chen Shui-bian's (
Odd as it may seem, Chen should be congratulated for this. Beset by government agencies and an opposition that refuse to reform the pallid images that pass off as national symbols, most Taiwanese have dismissed national identity as worthy of discussion.
Yet Chen is spot on -- and, for once, eloquent -- when he says: "We only have two choices. Either we sit still and wait for death, or we reach out spontaneously and show the world that Taiwan exists."
Taiwan's diplomatic dilemma is spiced up by a paradox -- rarely discussed -- that helps students of politics appreciate the meaning of realpolitik.
During the 1980s, under the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), Taiwan's allies were a who's who of rightist, military and/or racist autocracies or near-failed states that China wouldn't touch. Somoza's Nicaragua was one, along with Liberia, South Africa, South Korea and other brutal administrations.
Ironically, Taiwan's democratization came more or less in tandem with China's final, comprehensive trashing of the egalitarian principles that energized its people and that were used to justify a "proletarian" dictatorship -- and which attracted support from leftist governments around the world.
As Taiwan's formerly repressive allies became more democratic, they turned their backs on a democratizing Taiwan to open their doors to an enduringly repressive China. Having already made the switch to China in 1985 and then back to Taiwan in 1990 in step with its electoral cycle, Nicaragua would appear to be the latest of these, regardless of Chen's appearance at Nicaraguan president-elect Daniel Ortega's inauguration and any private sympathy Ortega himself might have for the Taiwanese.
Trying to convince Ortega and his party to stick by Taiwan is a tall order. As with other allies who have demonstrated their financial, commercial or ideological inclination toward China, a leftist Nicaragua is a prime candidate for newest lost ally.
If Chen does walk away from the capital without a sincere assurance from Ortega, he could do worse than fire off this parting shot: Look at what Beijing did to Guatemala and Haiti and consider the contempt China felt toward their disempowered, shell-shocked populations by threatening to boycott UN peacekeepers simply because Taiwan was their ally. By any moral standard -- for liberals or conservatives, leftists or rightists -- China's misanthropy was, and is, detestable.
Taiwan has been named and criticized as a corruptor of poor nations through checkbook diplomacy. Even if this is the case, the truth is that, unlike Taiwan, China's involvement in poor regions is not under the control of a democratically elected government and is therefore unaccountable to all but the most mercenary of bureaucrats.
Nor is it necessarily stabilizing. That China should be cited as a potential patron by the thugs impersonating soldiers in Fiji's latest disastrous coup in the face of boycotts by Australia and New Zealand says far more about China than any number of accusations against Taiwanese funny money can say about Taiwan.
The risk for Chen is that he could look utterly inept if Nicaragua were to swap allegiance soon after the inauguration. Given his difficulties at home, however, Chen could hardly be intimidated by such minor corrosion of his image. If anything, Chen's willingness to take the flight to an uncertain ally and fly the flag, so to speak, is the sign of a president who might just be beginning to fight back.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS