In commenting on the mayoral elections held in Taipei and Kaohsiung, many political pundits have said that the results reflected trends among pan-green and pan-blue supporters on the issue of national identity.
The importance of national identity for voters raises questions about how best to tackle the issue.
Ruan Ming (
However, the China that must be understood is not the one that has been deliberately eulogized by pro-China media outlets, but the empire of lies depicted in L'annee du Coq: Chinois et Rebelles by French writer Guy Sorman.
As admirers of Chinese culture, most Western China experts tend to paint a rosy picture of the country.
Many of them are also leftists who loathe capitalism and yearn for the communist ideal of equality for all.
The doyen of sinology, late Harvard professor John Fairbank, was deeply puzzled by Beijing's decision to violently suppress pro-democracy demonstrations in Tiananmen Square in 1989 and said that China was too complex for Westerners to read.
Today, many Westerners fail to see the dark shadow that looms behind the bright lights of China's economic boom.
What makes Sorman different is that he is a right-wing academic who supports US neo-conservatism and loathes socialism.
He does not paint a rosy picture of China, but has the courage to criticize it instead.
When commenting on L'annee du Coq: Chinois et Rebelles, Pu Ta-chung (
More importantly, Sorman's book is based largely on first-hand research.
It reveals that in China, legal contracts are often unenforceable, the judiciary has no independence and corruption is rampant.
Sorman also mentions that once foreign businesspeople arrive in China, they begin to lose their sense of judgement and disregard the universal standards adopted by economies around the world.
Sorman finds that economic statistics are worthless in China, for they are compiled by a government that cares little about their accuracy.
For example, during the early 1990s, official Chinese statistics persistently claimed that the country's cultivated land only amounted to about 95 million hectares, a figure that gave China less arable land per capita than Bangladesh.
However, satellite photographs indicate that China has a total of 150 million hectares of arable land. By under-reporting the amount of arable land by almost one third, the Chinese authorities' purpose was to highlight the government's efficiency in feeding its people despite a considerable land "shortage."
Mao Yishi (茅以軾), a Beijing-based economist, said that although China's economy is growing at a rate of 8 percent annually, it has wreaked havoc on the environment.
The resulting land exhaustion, pollution and disease have in fact caused a decline of 10 percent. Thus, China's economic development is really a disaster.
Anyone who attempts to tell the truth in China is suppressed, either by intimidation or by force. Small wonder Sorman views China as a barbarian country.
Cao Changqing is a Chinese writer based in the US.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS