Just as early polls predicted, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate Hau Lung-bin (
However, in Kaohsiung, KMT candidate Huang Chun-ying (
To begin with, this election is most significant for entrenching Taiwan's two-party political landscape. People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (
With Soong out of the game, the PFP now finds itself hurried along toward its ultimate demise as the two-party system is strengthened.
Meanwhile, Hau has gone from strength to strength since leaving the New Party to return to the KMT, allowing him to demolish Hsieh and Soong, two politicians with strong administrative experience. The contrast in the results between the two pan-blue candidates discredits the idea that the candidates and their political stances were important in this election. The smaller parties may have had their day completely within the pan-blue and pan-green camps.
And why should it be any different in Kaohsiung, one of the DPP's traditional strongholds? The Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) initially wanted to take advantage of the DPP corruption scandals to emerge from its role as second fiddle to the DPP and distinguish between the "real and fake localization parties."
However, its performance in this election proves that it awaits the same fate as the other smaller parties. With former president Lee Teng-hui's (
In addition, the numbers illustrate that the KMT and DPP have maintained their respective support bases in the north and south. Right now, President Chen Shui-bian (
If this voting pattern becomes implanted and moderate voters migrate toward the extremes of the political spectrum, then I predict that KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
It's also important to compare the different strengths of the two parties in waging their campaigns. In the up-and-down Kaohsiung race, Huang, who polls had originally shown to be the leader, once more missed an opportunity to seize the coveted mayorship. The KMT took a conservative approach, choosing to lay back and avoid a fight rather than face its opponent head on. This low-key strategy eventually eroded the party's initial advantage.
Just like the controversy over the assassination attempt on President Chen during the 2004 election, the effect of the alleged vote buying in this year's election in Kaohsiung was not as significant as it first seemed. The upset at the end of the 2004 election made everyone wonder whether the KMT had used its six years in opposition to prepare and transform itself into a party capable of winning votes -- so too with the mayoral election.
Ma called the results of the poll a "draw," but the KMT should have won in Kaohsiung. Not only will this lack of drive force Taiwan to continue to bear an allegedly corrupt ruling party, but it must now face the bleak prospect of an ineffective opposition party as well. How can the nation endure such a situation?
With the votes counted, the candidates' battle has drawn to a close. But for the Taiwanese, who bear the heavy responsibility of upholding Taiwan's democracy, the battle has only just begun. If we can make the rational decision to accept the election results, if we let the victors enjoy the sweet fruits of Taiwan's democracy and the losers make the courageous decision to try again another day, then Taiwan's democracy will emerge from the storm and move toward calmer waters.
Fong Ruey-jay is a doctoral student in political science at the University of North Texas.
Translated by Marc Langer
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS