The question of the relationship between Taiwan and the Republic of China (ROC) has been a flashpoint in Taiwanese politics for a long time. During the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) time in power, the title "Republic of China" has rapidly been adopted as acceptable, as the "status quo."
In terms of concrete policy, even though the governing and opposition parties have different views on the relationship between Taiwan and the People's Republic of China (PRC), the ROC has become mainstream in the nation's political scene, though it is defined in different ways.
Many years of education obliging students to identify with the country "China" has obstructed formation of a national consciousness of Taiwan as a sovereign nation. In addition, foreign diplomacy has always been led by those who subscribed to the "one China" and ROC concepts.
Today it is possible to separate the two Chinas represented by the PRC and the ROC. This is no small development. In particular, the ROC government has long since terminated efforts to "suppress the rebellion" in China, and has recognized the PRC.
If the PRC were also willing to accept that its revolution is complete and give up claims to the ROC, then the lingering issue of the Chinese Civil War could be resolved. But as the PRC insists on its right to succeed the ROC government under the "one China" policy, the Chinese Civil War continues as Taiwan tries to develop itself into a normal country.
Looking at it historically, ever since the UN passed Albania's proposal for the PRC to inherit the ROC right to represent China in 1971, anyone who wants to advocate that Taiwan shouldn't accept China's control of the position must consider the meaning of Taiwanese sovereignty.
Set against the backdrop of this era, political thinker Lei Chen (
In 1972, Lei proposed changing the ROC's title to the Democratic State of Taiwan-China (
In other words, it was to be a new sovereign nation and not merely an inheritance of the ROC.
Therefore, in consideration of creating a new constitution, amending the national title and moving beyond the Chinese Civil War, it is important from a legal perspective for the Taiwanese to exercise their right as sovereign citizens to create a new constitution and to clearly express that they have established an independent nation separate of China.
Hsueh Hua-yuan is the director of the Graduate Institute of Taiwan History at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Marc Langer
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS