The question of the relationship between Taiwan and the Republic of China (ROC) has been a flashpoint in Taiwanese politics for a long time. During the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) time in power, the title "Republic of China" has rapidly been adopted as acceptable, as the "status quo."
In terms of concrete policy, even though the governing and opposition parties have different views on the relationship between Taiwan and the People's Republic of China (PRC), the ROC has become mainstream in the nation's political scene, though it is defined in different ways.
Many years of education obliging students to identify with the country "China" has obstructed formation of a national consciousness of Taiwan as a sovereign nation. In addition, foreign diplomacy has always been led by those who subscribed to the "one China" and ROC concepts.
Today it is possible to separate the two Chinas represented by the PRC and the ROC. This is no small development. In particular, the ROC government has long since terminated efforts to "suppress the rebellion" in China, and has recognized the PRC.
If the PRC were also willing to accept that its revolution is complete and give up claims to the ROC, then the lingering issue of the Chinese Civil War could be resolved. But as the PRC insists on its right to succeed the ROC government under the "one China" policy, the Chinese Civil War continues as Taiwan tries to develop itself into a normal country.
Looking at it historically, ever since the UN passed Albania's proposal for the PRC to inherit the ROC right to represent China in 1971, anyone who wants to advocate that Taiwan shouldn't accept China's control of the position must consider the meaning of Taiwanese sovereignty.
Set against the backdrop of this era, political thinker Lei Chen (
In 1972, Lei proposed changing the ROC's title to the Democratic State of Taiwan-China (
In other words, it was to be a new sovereign nation and not merely an inheritance of the ROC.
Therefore, in consideration of creating a new constitution, amending the national title and moving beyond the Chinese Civil War, it is important from a legal perspective for the Taiwanese to exercise their right as sovereign citizens to create a new constitution and to clearly express that they have established an independent nation separate of China.
Hsueh Hua-yuan is the director of the Graduate Institute of Taiwan History at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Marc Langer
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS