When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate Chen Chu (
The KMT's reaction simply proves once again that the party has absolutely no respect whatsoever for the nation's democracy.
A clear pattern has developed in recent years, with the party protesting the result of any important election it loses.
It began with the 2000 presidential election. When the KMT received a thumping following James Soong's (
The trend continued with weeks of protests following the KMT's narrow presidential defeat in 2004, when the election-eve shooting of President Chen Shui-bian (
To that list add Kaohsiung 2006.
Maybe this is why the pan-blue camp has come to be known as the "refuse to lose crowd" by certain sections of the US diplomatic community, including former American Institute in Taiwan chairwoman Therese Shaheen, who wrote about it in a Wall Street Journal article on Nov. 8.
When was the last time a KMT figure stood up and accepted defeat graciously or even lauded Taiwan's democratic achievements?
The party's total disdain for democracy can be seen in the way it has systematically undermined the leadership of its popularly elected chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
And the KMT's decision to establish a working relationship with the authoritarian Chinese Communist Party further demonstrates its contempt for the nation's democratic system.
It was former president and KMT chairman Lee Teng-hui (
Certain sections of the party's old guard are so unwilling to accept defeat that they would happily bring back one-party authoritarian rule tomorrow if they thought they could get away with it.
The KMT's strategy of trying to make Saturday's elections a plebiscite on the integrity of its chairman and the president failed. For whatever reasons, voters showed that politicians getting their fingers caught in the cash register wasn't enough for them to change their political affiliation.
So instead of blaming their Kaohsiung defeat on faulty ballot-counting and vote-buying accusations, the KMT should start looking at the reasons why the majority of voters in the south continue to reject them.
The KMT needs to put two and two together and work out why the popularity it enjoyed during the Lee era has vanished.
But it won't.
The party's troubles stem from arrogance, an inability to believe it is wrong and a reluctance to examine unpopular policy platforms and revise them accordingly -- all of which are critical to democratic success.
Only when it does this will it be able to stop calling into question the integrity of the nation's democratic institutions and instead make them work in the party's favor.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS