In an extremely tight race in Kaohsiung, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate Chen Chu (陳菊) won her mayoral bid over Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) mayoral candidate Huang Chun-ying (黃俊英) by a razor-thin margin of 1,114 votes.
The Central Election Commission (CEC) said that Chen garnered 379,417 votes, while Huang obtained 378,303.
As the final votes were still being counted, the vote difference between Chen and Huang was getting smaller and smaller. Nevertheless, Huang still lost to Chen and placed second.
But given the small margin of votes by which Chen won the election, Huang will probably demand a vote recount and today he could very well initiate such a lawsuit to nullify the elections.
Kaohsiung and most of the southern cities are traditional pan-green strongholds; therefore, the DPP technically would be expected to capture more than enough votes to seize control of the city.
But given the recent scandals plaguing the first family and the resulting mood among DPP members, the DPP had not been able to hold a strong lead until about a week prior to the elections.
When looking at the issues that influenced voters in the Kaohsiung election, the key factors that led to a DPP victory are two-fold:
First, clashes in downtown Kaohsiung -- where Chen Chun-sheng (陳春生), convener of a "depose Chen" campaign office in the city, held a gathering aimed at building momentum for the anti-presidential campaign -- served to arouse a fierce reaction from DPP supporters and helped consolidate the cohesion of the DPP.
Second, Lin I-hsiung's (林義雄) appearance on the stage at a campaign event in support of Chen also influenced pan-blue supporters' voting decisions.
Furthermore, a higher voter turnout of 67.93 percent, though lower than the turnout of 71.4 percent in the previous election, could also have influenced the election results in Kaohsiung since the higher the voter turnout, the more likely Chen was to be elected.
Other elements include previous DPP administrative achievements, such as the restoration of the Love River and other efforts to revive the arts and the cultural environment.
As to the political meaning of the election for next year's legislative elections under the new "single-member district, two-vote system," it is likely that the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) and the People First Party will evaporate and the future political landscape will become purely a DPP-KMT divide.
Also, if former President Lee Teng-hui (
In fact, standing at opposite ends of the spectrum of either supporting Taiwanese independence or advocating unification does not benefit Taiwan for the moment.
Whether Lee will be able to play an influential role in future politics will depend on what approaches he will choose to develop a consciousness for Taiwanese.
Also, the media should be blamed for the current political unrest.
"The media is a seed of poison planted by Taiwan" is a saying that reminds us not to be carried away by reporting which presents the political situation like a soap opera and causes people to become disillusioned.
It is ironic that pan-blue supporters do not use the same standard to judge President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) misuse of "state affairs funds" to examine irregularities in Taipei Mayor and KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou's (
There is clearly a double standard at work here. If the pan-blue supporters can have leniency in their hearts, then I believe that Taiwanese politics will move in a healthy and positive direction.
Lee Chung-pan is a professor in the Department of Marine Environment and Engineering at National Sun Yat-sen University.
Compiled by Lin Ya-ti
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS