When it comes to elections, it is generally acknowledged that all politics are -- or should be -- local. Nevertheless, the key issues that characterize the upcoming mayoral and city councilor elections are often associated with national and political rhetoric and have nothing to do with who is capable of doing the job.
For example, Chinese Nationalist Party Chairman (KMT) Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has called upon the voters to use the elections as a no-confidence vote on the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) allegedly corruption-driven governance. The KMT's candidate for Taipei, Hao Lung-bin (郝龍斌), has characterized the mayoral election as a decisive test for the 2008 presidential election.
The KMT has adopted the strategy of defaming President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), members of the first family and Chen's Cabinet as a way to sabotage the image of the DPP candidates in Taipei and Kaohsiung.
As a result, DPP Taipei mayoral candidate Frank Hsieh (
It is also difficult to see why KMT Taipei mayoral candidate Hao's past working experience in the DPP Cabinet would affect his capability to serve as mayor, as some commentators might be tempted to argue.
From the voters' perspective, why should problems associated with the nation's leaders affect how or why they choose a mayor or a city councilor?
Campaigns cannot win if they are based solely on a negative message. Their organizers must come up with positive images and feasible visions. Negative campaigns have their place, but they should not be the focal point of a winning campaign.
Negative campaigns are sometimes used as tactical tools to gain an advantage. But most of the time, negativity will only work once a party has laid out an alternative vision for their candidate through positive advertisements and determination to reform.
For example, Hsieh was better known for his successful revamping of Kaohsiung's Love River -- once a dark and stinky stream -- into a clean area that is perfect for leisure. To what extent, then, can Hao surpass Hsieh in this regard?
Hao's greatest challenge, therefore, lies in showing how he could do a better job than Ma if he were to win the election. While the incumbent usually carries a substantial challenge of retaining his supporters, his successor must demonstrate a different leadership style and vision. Hao has nevertheless criticized Ma's failure to crack down on the sex industry, to manage the SARS crisis and to handle damage caused by typhoons.
For Hsieh to win more votes -- especially from Taipei's middle class -- he needs to make it clear to the residents how he would manage to go beyond his accomplishments in Kaohsiung. Relentlessly criticizing the Hao family's alleged inappropriate use of public funds is just not a good tactic.
In Kaohsiung, the KMT's mayoral candidate Hung Jun-ying (黃俊英) must stop playing the "sympathy card" by exploiting the car accident involving Shirley Shaw (邵曉鈴), the wife of Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強), and honestly demonstrate to the voters why he can regain the support of the party's rank and file, which he lost four years ago.
His DPP rival, Chen Chu (
By overlooking the importance of reporting the messages of the candidates and instead focusing on the character assassination war, the media are failing in their obligation to provide the electorate with the means by which to judge the value of platforms of the candidates.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS