When it comes to elections, it is generally acknowledged that all politics are -- or should be -- local. Nevertheless, the key issues that characterize the upcoming mayoral and city councilor elections are often associated with national and political rhetoric and have nothing to do with who is capable of doing the job.
For example, Chinese Nationalist Party Chairman (KMT) Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has called upon the voters to use the elections as a no-confidence vote on the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) allegedly corruption-driven governance. The KMT's candidate for Taipei, Hao Lung-bin (郝龍斌), has characterized the mayoral election as a decisive test for the 2008 presidential election.
The KMT has adopted the strategy of defaming President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), members of the first family and Chen's Cabinet as a way to sabotage the image of the DPP candidates in Taipei and Kaohsiung.
As a result, DPP Taipei mayoral candidate Frank Hsieh (
It is also difficult to see why KMT Taipei mayoral candidate Hao's past working experience in the DPP Cabinet would affect his capability to serve as mayor, as some commentators might be tempted to argue.
From the voters' perspective, why should problems associated with the nation's leaders affect how or why they choose a mayor or a city councilor?
Campaigns cannot win if they are based solely on a negative message. Their organizers must come up with positive images and feasible visions. Negative campaigns have their place, but they should not be the focal point of a winning campaign.
Negative campaigns are sometimes used as tactical tools to gain an advantage. But most of the time, negativity will only work once a party has laid out an alternative vision for their candidate through positive advertisements and determination to reform.
For example, Hsieh was better known for his successful revamping of Kaohsiung's Love River -- once a dark and stinky stream -- into a clean area that is perfect for leisure. To what extent, then, can Hao surpass Hsieh in this regard?
Hao's greatest challenge, therefore, lies in showing how he could do a better job than Ma if he were to win the election. While the incumbent usually carries a substantial challenge of retaining his supporters, his successor must demonstrate a different leadership style and vision. Hao has nevertheless criticized Ma's failure to crack down on the sex industry, to manage the SARS crisis and to handle damage caused by typhoons.
For Hsieh to win more votes -- especially from Taipei's middle class -- he needs to make it clear to the residents how he would manage to go beyond his accomplishments in Kaohsiung. Relentlessly criticizing the Hao family's alleged inappropriate use of public funds is just not a good tactic.
In Kaohsiung, the KMT's mayoral candidate Hung Jun-ying (黃俊英) must stop playing the "sympathy card" by exploiting the car accident involving Shirley Shaw (邵曉鈴), the wife of Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強), and honestly demonstrate to the voters why he can regain the support of the party's rank and file, which he lost four years ago.
His DPP rival, Chen Chu (
By overlooking the importance of reporting the messages of the candidates and instead focusing on the character assassination war, the media are failing in their obligation to provide the electorate with the means by which to judge the value of platforms of the candidates.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS