If the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) wins the Taipei and Kaohsiung mayoral elections, it will give a tremendous boost to the party's morale and lay a foundation for next year's legislative elections and the 2008 presidential election.
If, however, the DPP is defeated in both races, that will be a major blow.
If that happens, calls for President Chen Shui-bian's (
If the DPP loses Taipei but maintains its hold on Kaohsiung, that would be a small loss balanced by an important victory. In the Kaohsiung mayoral race, Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) mayoral candidate Lo Chih-ming (
Many pan-greens are now hoping that Lo will withdraw from the race to increase support for DPP Kaohsiung mayoral candidate Chen Chu (
A politician must weigh the pros and cons before deciding if he or she wants to run for office. When Lo's only option is losing, and when a timely withdrawal could boost Chen Chu's campaign and the DPP as a whole, it is not only irrational to say that Lo should under no circumstances withdraw his candidacy, but it may also harm the green camp, as well as the TSU and Lo's own future.
If Lo does refuse to withdraw from the race, he will face one of three consequences.
First, if Chen Chu wins the election, Lo and the TSU will have played an insignificant role and the DPP will have shown that it is able to win elections without their support.
Second, if Chen Chu loses the election and the number of extra votes she needed to win is less than the number of votes Lo gains, then the TSU and Lo will be blamed for an important pan-green electoral loss.
If that happens, the long-term negative impact on both will be substantial.
Third, if Chen loses the election, and does so regardless of Lo's vote, Lo and the TSU will still give the pan-green camp the impression that they don't care about the bigger picture.
This would also affect the development of the party.
Taiwan's political situation is similar to that of the US: Two major political parties divide public support equally, leaving little space for smaller parties and almost no chance to compete for important positions.
If Lo's approval ratings were higher than Chen Chu's, I believe that pro-green camp political strategists and commentators would urge pan-green supporters to vote for Lo.
But this is not the reality.
If Lo does not quit, he will lose grassroots support, but if he considers the overall situation and decides to pull out, he can still hope to be elected to the legislature or other positions in future.
Withdrawing his candidacy is the only way to win.
Cao Changqing is a Chinese writer based in the US.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS