It is said that Chinese President Hu Jintao's (
This is not necessarily true as one of these approaches often dominates the other. If Hu's counterpart softens, he responds with tougher tactics, but if his counterparts take a hard line, he softens and becomes a paper tiger.
A closer look at Hu's recent diplomatic moves will help clear up any doubts on the matter.
Earlier this month, Hu displayed his soft approach to politics at the Beijing Summit of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) by lavishing money on the 48 participating African nations. Clearly, Hu was copying former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) chairman Mao Zedong's (
But despite his stylish maneuvering, Hu made a clumsy impression on his guests.
In order to attack imperialism, Hu took aim at Canada. One reason for his attack might have been that the Conservative Party recently took power in Canada, and Hu wanted to come across as looking tough and in control. Another reason could have been the close relationship between Canada and the US; Hu may have wanted to attack Canada to warn the US.
Then at the APEC summit in Hanoi from Nov. 17 to Nov. 19, China approached Canada about a formal meeting between Hu and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper. When Canada listed human rights on the list of issues to discuss, China canceled the meeting.
Unexpectedly, Harper responded by saying that "I don't think Canadians want us to sell out important Canadian values -- our belief in democracy, freedom, human rights."
Despite Harper's forceful response, China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs still said that Hu would meet Harper during the summit. In the end, the two leaders did meet and China said that the human rights issue was not discussed.
After the conclusion of the APEC meeting, Hu continued on to India. Although border dusputes between India and China still exist, Beijing's current "good neighbor" policy means that it respects India's control line along the border.
During Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao's (
As a result, Indian Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee on Nov. 14 requested that China recall Sun. Sun was later forced to modify his stance by saying that the China-India border dispute can only be solved through a bilateral compromise and that China is ready to do so.
Whether Hu visited India to compromise or to contest every inch of territory will shed light on China's desire for unification with Taiwan at any cost.
China's quickly changing attitudes are not limited to this incident. Other examples are its blockade of online information by forcing companies like Yahoo, Microsoft, Google, Cisco and others to submit to Chinese regulations and sometimes even help it pursue ethically questionable policies.
Last month, Chinese authorities blocked access to the English version of Wikipedia. Wikipedia, however, did not give in to the pressure and the blockade has now quietly been lifted.
All these examples serve to underline that if you are soft in dealing with a rogue regime, it will run roughshod over you; but if you stick to your principles, it will back down.
Unfortunately, some major powers accommodate this rouge country, and -- whether it be due to threats or incentives -- sacrifice universal values. If Canada, India and Wikipedia on their own are able to force China to compromise, then why can't all democratic nations or powerful Internet companies do so through a united front? Together, wouldn't they be able to resist Chinese political intervention, work to guarantee freedom and democracy and force China to respect human rights and world peace?
The run up to the 2008 Beijing Olympics is the best time for all democratic nations to stand up to China.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in Taipei.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS