At a UN meeting last month, a bespectacled Swede made a small, barely noticed announcement that nevertheless represented a pivotal moment in the history of the Internet.
"Regarding the technical implementation for the World Wide Web, we are done," Patrik Faltstrom told the Internet Governance Forum.
By "we are done," he meant that following a decade of hard work by a global consortium of engineers and linguists, they had finally decided on a document that will enable all the world's languages to be fully represented on the Internet. People will be able to type in addresses in their own language, search in their own language and move around the Internet in their own language.
The challenge was every bit as immense as it sounds. The Internet was designed to work with the English alphabet -- "a" to "z," and the numbers "1" through "9." Useful symbols rapidly made their way into the system -- plus, minus, dash, and so on -- each represented with a particular code (or, as Internet engineers insist on calling it, an "identifier"). Agreeing on identifiers was easy at first, but as Internet use spread across the globe, people started asking for more to be added to fit other languages, whether an accent on a letter, or an entirely different alphabet.
Global balancing act
As languages have spread and developed, some elements have changed and some stayed the same. Some have grown to have different meanings. Some look identical and are anything but.
One thing is for certain: Everyone is unshakeable in their belief that their language is as valid as any other. No matter how wonderful the Internet is, it does not override culture and history. The result has been a very careful balance.
"No script and no person will be happy with the definition of identifiers," Faltstrom said.
"Everyone will be unhappy. We just have to find a standard that makes people the least unhappy," he said.
It can be difficult for an English speaker to grasp the problem. For example, the small dots over the "a" and "o" in Faltstrom's surname carry significance and meaning. Because it is a Western language, we are able to view it as an "a" and an "o" with some dots. Not so with different alphabets. Fortunately, there is a real-world example that makes this global balancing act more understandable.
Richard Haigh is a British Web designer from the city of Nottingham and the proud owner of "?.com." He has decided he wants to use the site to cover the debate over Britain's possible future adoption of the euro.
"When it does kick off, I want to provide somewhere where people can voice their concerns," he explains.
Despite having "no personal belief either way," he thinks that he's on to something unique with his pound-symbol domain name.
But Haigh doesn't actually own "?.com." He owns "xn--9a.com" -- the identifier used to represent the pound symbol. In fact, ?.com. doesn't (strictly speaking) exist.
Why? Ask John Klensin, who is, along with Faltstrom, the person most responsible for unusual additions to the Internet's domain name system. He is blunt about Haigh's Web address.
"The ?.com. domain shouldn't exist -- it has been prohibited all along," he said.
When told it clearly does exist, he is unremitting: "If [the Web address] resolves, it is probably another bug. Somehow it has been sneaked through."
Haphazard nature
In fact, when you type ?.com. into your browser you are in fact entering the ? sign's identifier, xn--9a. Your browser translates the ? sign as its identifier, goes to xn--9a.com and is then redirected to the more palatable poundsymbol.com.
How? Because "?" is just another identifier. For computers, ? is dealt with in exactly the same way as o. But since ? isn't a part of a language, it is one of the identifiers that has not made it through the process.
There is a good reason why, Klemsin explained.
"For some, `pound' means the hash symbol [#], for others it is the pound sterling symbol ?, and others refer to the hash/pound symbol as the `number sign.' It is a communications nightmare," he said.
But ?.com does exist, thanks to the haphazard way the Internet was created. If something takes off, it rapidly becomes part of the system; if it doesn't, it is left to wither on the vine. But no one is discourteous enough to remove the failed experiments on the way.
There is a long and often complex procedure that arrives at a set of standards, recognized officially, that ensures something will be accessible right across the Internet. After a very long, often difficult process, that standard for including the world's languages has now been put forward to the one organization that can formally enter it into the Internet -- the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), based in California.
ICANN has put out a formal request for comments as a final precaution. And once that process is finished, then everyone has to figure out how to actually make the standards work with the existing Internet infrastructure -- another daunting task already under way. The truly global Internet is on its way.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS