At a UN meeting last month, a bespectacled Swede made a small, barely noticed announcement that nevertheless represented a pivotal moment in the history of the Internet.
"Regarding the technical implementation for the World Wide Web, we are done," Patrik Faltstrom told the Internet Governance Forum.
By "we are done," he meant that following a decade of hard work by a global consortium of engineers and linguists, they had finally decided on a document that will enable all the world's languages to be fully represented on the Internet. People will be able to type in addresses in their own language, search in their own language and move around the Internet in their own language.
The challenge was every bit as immense as it sounds. The Internet was designed to work with the English alphabet -- "a" to "z," and the numbers "1" through "9." Useful symbols rapidly made their way into the system -- plus, minus, dash, and so on -- each represented with a particular code (or, as Internet engineers insist on calling it, an "identifier"). Agreeing on identifiers was easy at first, but as Internet use spread across the globe, people started asking for more to be added to fit other languages, whether an accent on a letter, or an entirely different alphabet.
Global balancing act
As languages have spread and developed, some elements have changed and some stayed the same. Some have grown to have different meanings. Some look identical and are anything but.
One thing is for certain: Everyone is unshakeable in their belief that their language is as valid as any other. No matter how wonderful the Internet is, it does not override culture and history. The result has been a very careful balance.
"No script and no person will be happy with the definition of identifiers," Faltstrom said.
"Everyone will be unhappy. We just have to find a standard that makes people the least unhappy," he said.
It can be difficult for an English speaker to grasp the problem. For example, the small dots over the "a" and "o" in Faltstrom's surname carry significance and meaning. Because it is a Western language, we are able to view it as an "a" and an "o" with some dots. Not so with different alphabets. Fortunately, there is a real-world example that makes this global balancing act more understandable.
Richard Haigh is a British Web designer from the city of Nottingham and the proud owner of "?.com." He has decided he wants to use the site to cover the debate over Britain's possible future adoption of the euro.
"When it does kick off, I want to provide somewhere where people can voice their concerns," he explains.
Despite having "no personal belief either way," he thinks that he's on to something unique with his pound-symbol domain name.
But Haigh doesn't actually own "?.com." He owns "xn--9a.com" -- the identifier used to represent the pound symbol. In fact, ?.com. doesn't (strictly speaking) exist.
Why? Ask John Klensin, who is, along with Faltstrom, the person most responsible for unusual additions to the Internet's domain name system. He is blunt about Haigh's Web address.
"The ?.com. domain shouldn't exist -- it has been prohibited all along," he said.
When told it clearly does exist, he is unremitting: "If [the Web address] resolves, it is probably another bug. Somehow it has been sneaked through."
Haphazard nature
In fact, when you type ?.com. into your browser you are in fact entering the ? sign's identifier, xn--9a. Your browser translates the ? sign as its identifier, goes to xn--9a.com and is then redirected to the more palatable poundsymbol.com.
How? Because "?" is just another identifier. For computers, ? is dealt with in exactly the same way as o. But since ? isn't a part of a language, it is one of the identifiers that has not made it through the process.
There is a good reason why, Klemsin explained.
"For some, `pound' means the hash symbol [#], for others it is the pound sterling symbol ?, and others refer to the hash/pound symbol as the `number sign.' It is a communications nightmare," he said.
But ?.com does exist, thanks to the haphazard way the Internet was created. If something takes off, it rapidly becomes part of the system; if it doesn't, it is left to wither on the vine. But no one is discourteous enough to remove the failed experiments on the way.
There is a long and often complex procedure that arrives at a set of standards, recognized officially, that ensures something will be accessible right across the Internet. After a very long, often difficult process, that standard for including the world's languages has now been put forward to the one organization that can formally enter it into the Internet -- the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), based in California.
ICANN has put out a formal request for comments as a final precaution. And once that process is finished, then everyone has to figure out how to actually make the standards work with the existing Internet infrastructure -- another daunting task already under way. The truly global Internet is on its way.
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in
RSS