Whether or not Taipei Mayor and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Following the revelations of Ma's mayoral fund, it has emerged that these special accounts have been available to some 6,500 local government officials since the 1950s.
With details of these funds now emerging -- along with earlier exposure of the special 18 percent preferential interest rate for pensions enjoyed by retired teachers, soldiers and civil servants; the five-month salary payment given to certain government workers for funeral expenses; and other things such as tax-free earnings for military staff and civil servants -- the public is slowly but surely becoming aware of how recklessly large amounts of their tax dollars have been misused over the years.
Ma's claim that remitting half of the special mayoral fund into his personal bank account was "normal" and lawful just goes to highlight the lack of oversight for public money that has prevailed and how shady practices have become institutionalized.
The whole government system is littered with such examples. But should we really be surprised?
After all, the KMT -- the party that created Taiwan's political system -- has long been a party driven by nepotism and corruption.
Historians note that a failure to combat corruption was one of the main reasons why Chiang Kai-shek's (
And rampant corruption is why, after just 18 months of KMT rule under executive administrator Chen Yi (
The KMT's system of patronage was imported wholesale from China along with the Nationalist government and allowed to flourish during its five decades of party-state rule.
But it was done with good reason: the KMT needed to foster a culture of party loyalty to help preserve its rule on Taiwan.
And it was this need that led to the creation of such generous benefits for anybody that was willing to serve and remain faithful to the party.
Under a system like this, is it any wonder that career politicians like former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
Ironically, it is now time to thank the KMT and the pan-blue camp, because their ceaseless and frenzied attempts to harm the president and win back power have inadvertently opened a can of worms that will possibly help to bring crashing down the flawed system that it profited from for five decades.
The fallout from the mayoral and presidential fund scandals is now threatening to spread, affecting officials past and present from both sides of the political divide, and hopefully bringing an end to yet another unwelcome relic of the party-state era.
But the most disappointing aspect of the whole episode is the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) role in bringing this about.
After years of hounding the KMT, accusing it of corruption and amassing stolen assets, the DPP seemed content after coming to power to sit back and enjoy the spoils of its victory instead of getting to work and rectifying all that was wrong with the rotten system it inherited.
That inactivity could now cost the party dearly.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS